From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99080C742A7 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 09:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229815AbjCHJPa (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 04:15:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230385AbjCHJOu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 04:14:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0BC97FF0 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id x3so62795837edb.10 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1678266863; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVlbKIsIKONcencGIlCVz/zMUTdvcvIEPXx7D+3nAjE=; b=LdA5rx163AC+HgqVyIy+sy0Gl2nZwk1NtVqeLbyS5v9JeajHfWzDBa611KYlhHeaDi ouXMK6QlKT4MdFQgjITg2J1sILL900Aotrlzbi01m1MOeSiDZWxCDKVWMVSTISylWC2j vMCOQdHCAF/3wxvSvMqdfjqZzaY6JEG05DNHC0+4ya97xSpTA42hEBVqk5alDM92V2/F EEVFlGMFMGn4FJ9wFPmNkvujBM6TWZxBRKW5wvDqwzg60t9TSEGjGnY+LtAbAPDrzIos pOLLFa0cfOUXLsOeWhVetUN10kUdFHIlhKVJ1p9sfy2dDuhaTQy6WchgcNxtXK3HP+GT Y/ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678266863; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WVlbKIsIKONcencGIlCVz/zMUTdvcvIEPXx7D+3nAjE=; b=SY9m2YUSOl0zH1JFfl8v41jVlJ3cjhbNGEqlf3D0hvGdTyFzqipMzPdHcogredtQp7 SdnzlclGc6wDjOwCCBu7/KkUIh2EmjMZnVUWJh7S6peDQqvNgF8ZCXpq6muIpQywKI9D ZmrQyTg3hWoEuOMbyMBSTTSDKS22lRR/h+I9s0/HT60wfkwwnm0K0fdJbO4L1IpwVoaE yITaOXdWlL8fyqaSR1ftP6vDv1w1VDJmr+ZiXC9xdSF4O/vHlC7zkR14h5dECEuFsbMp CK2ueSHxOEOFuJXOVZeyxHuUdbcdBbLJV/RKbVzrecbM2+XnyhMgJkAFSmk8eipb5xlw 1qnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUQPC403wkHyU7dBAQQ6JEEAGwVDqpAtC9XdOBkVgMQyr6zU9XD XqZxx71PMJFkNL1ue80o+aJMxw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/5cil+g/8SOVvjrP1ln2Nvql2jHsS3WiDe7I+EHmOgynZqYeKxSssaFWa66dlwAxdmjzlPSA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1291:b0:4ad:66b:84a5 with SMTP id w17-20020a056402129100b004ad066b84a5mr16082411edv.22.1678266863518; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:810d:15c0:828:bba:fbfa:8aec:a133? ([2a02:810d:15c0:828:bba:fbfa:8aec:a133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21-20020a50d4d5000000b004d47ce55e57sm6241720edj.10.2023.03.08.01.14.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Mar 2023 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <06f8eec8-94f3-0fed-b496-831c77baf368@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:14:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] max77663-rtc: pass rtc address from device tree node if exists Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Svyatoslav Ryhel Cc: Chanwoo Choi , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org References: <20230308083759.11692-1-clamor95@gmail.com> <190897d3-39b6-fb7c-dc18-dac580fadea6@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <190897d3-39b6-fb7c-dc18-dac580fadea6@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org On 08/03/2023 10:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/03/2023 09:58, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: >> I would love to, but max77663 uses max77686 rtc >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/mfd/max77620.c#L123 >> how to handle this? > > Don't top post. > > Hm, so it seems max7763 is already documented via max77620. I missed > that. Add the new property to max77620, not to max77686 RTC. It does not > look like RTC's property, but the PMIC's. To clarify - the I2C address selection for regmap is in max77686 RTC, but I meant DT property. Different thing is that we do not pass addresses as property fields. These should be devices on the I2C bus rather... unless you are aware of existing property like this? Best regards, Krzysztof