[PATCH 3/7] thermal: intel: pch: improve the cooling delay log

Zhang Rui
2022-05-05T01:58:29Z

Previously, during suspend, intel_pch_thermal driver logs for every
cooling iteration, about the current PCH temperature and number of cooling
iterations that have been tried, like below

[ 100.955526] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:14.2: CPU-PCH current temp [53C] higher than the threshold temp [50C], sleep 1 times for 100 ms duration
[ 101.064156] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:14.2: CPU-PCH current temp [53C] higher than the threshold temp [50C], sleep 2 times for 100 ms duration

After changing the default delay_cnt to 600, in practice, it is common to
see tens of the above messages if the system is suspended when PCH
overheats. Thus, change this log message from dev_warn to dev_dbg because
it is only useful when we want to check the temperature trend.

At the same time, there is always a one-line message given by the driver
with the patch applied, with below four possibilities.

1. PCH is cool, no cooling delay needed
[ 1791.902853] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:12.0: CPU-PCH is cool [48C]

2. PCH overheats and becomes cool after the cooling delays
[ 1475.511617] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:12.0: CPU-PCH is cool [49C] after 30700 ms delay

3. PCH still overheats after the overall cooling timeout
[ 2250.157487] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:12.0: CPU-PCH is hot [60C] after 60000 ms delay. S0ix might fail

4. PCH aborts cooling because of wakeup event detected during the delay
[ 1933.639509] intel_pch_thermal 0000:00:12.0: Wakeup event detected, abort cooling

Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
---
drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 31 +++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
index b7b32e2f5ae2..c1fa2b29b153 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int pch_wpt_get_temp(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd, int *temp)
static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd)
{
u8 tsel;
- int pch_delay_cnt = 1;
+ int pch_delay_cnt = 0;
u16 pch_thr_temp, pch_cur_temp;

/* Shutdown the thermal sensor if it is not enabled by BIOS */
@@ -233,29 +233,38 @@ static int pch_wpt_suspend(struct pch_thermal_device *ptd)
* temperature stays above threshold, notify the warning message
* which helps to indentify the reason why S0ix entry was rejected.
*/
- while (pch_delay_cnt <= delay_cnt) {
+ while (pch_delay_cnt < delay_cnt) {
if (pch_cur_temp < pch_thr_temp)
break;

- if (pm_wakeup_pending())
- break;
+ if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
+ dev_warn(&ptd->pdev->dev, "Wakeup event detected, abort cooling\n");
+ return 0;
+ }

- dev_warn(&ptd->pdev->dev,
+ pch_delay_cnt++;
+ dev_dbg(&ptd->pdev->dev,
"CPU-PCH current temp [%dC] higher than the threshold temp [%dC], sleep %d times for %d ms duration\n",
pch_cur_temp, pch_thr_temp, pch_delay_cnt, delay_timeout);
msleep(delay_timeout);
/* Read the PCH current temperature for next cycle. */
pch_cur_temp = GET_PCH_TEMP(WPT_TEMP_TSR & readw(ptd->hw_base + WPT_TEMP));
- pch_delay_cnt++;
}

if (pch_cur_temp >= pch_thr_temp)
dev_warn(&ptd->pdev->dev,
- "CPU-PCH is hot [%dC] even after delay, continue to suspend. S0ix might fail\n",
- pch_cur_temp);
- else
- dev_info(&ptd->pdev->dev,
- "CPU-PCH is cool [%dC], continue to suspend\n", pch_cur_temp);
+ "CPU-PCH is hot [%dC] after %d ms delay. S0ix might fail\n",
+ pch_cur_temp, pch_delay_cnt * delay_timeout);
+ else {
+ if (pch_delay_cnt)
+ dev_info(&ptd->pdev->dev,
+ "CPU-PCH is cool [%dC] after %d ms delay\n",
+ pch_cur_temp, pch_delay_cnt * delay_timeout);
+ else
+ dev_info(&ptd->pdev->dev,
+ "CPU-PCH is cool [%dC]\n",
+ pch_cur_temp);
+ }

return 0;
}
--
2.17.1