From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Andrew Christian <andrew.christian@hp.com>,
CIH <cih@coventive.com>, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@126.com>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [5/5] drivers/rtc/sa1100: Replace deprecated rtc_tm_to_time() and rtc_time_to_tm()
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 21:59:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601195909.GO4710@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3404495.679z0IaaBp@wuerfel>
Hi,
On 01/06/2015 at 21:43:22 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Note that Alexandre has stepped up as a new maintainer for RTC now,
> so whatever he wants is probably the way it should be done.
>
I'm still quite new in that position and I didn't make my mind in a lot
of different topics ;)
> I think the way that your first approach came out was a bit unfortunate,
> because we didn't have agreement on how it should really be done.
>
> IMHO the rtc_time64_to_hw32 and rtc_hw32_to_time64 interfaces were a
> good concept, most importantly so we can easily find where the potential
> problems are, but the implementation was a bit too ambitious in trying
> to fix the underlying issue.
>
> If we want to start this over again, I think a better approach would be
> to introduce trivial functions at first, like
>
> time64_t rtc_hw32_to_time64(u32 hwtime)
> {
> /*
> * this is safe until about 2106, when unsigned u32 seconds from the
> * 1970 epoch will overflow
> */
> return (u64)hwtime;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtc_hw32_to_time64);
>
> This way, we can fix all the drivers without introducing any possible
> ambiguity and later decide how that function should in fact handle the
> 2106 overflow. Our grandchildren can take care of that if necessary ;-)
>
We also have RTCs that can only store the year as an integer between 0
and 99. Some of them will definitively not pass 2099, considering that
the can only handle leap days between 2000 and 2099. Also, we have a few
drivers assuming that year >= 70 is in the 19s so they will stop working
correctly in 2070. I think we also have to consider those while trying
to find a solution.
I feel that we still have a bit of time before having to hurry and find
a proper solution ;)
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 9:20 [5/5] drivers/rtc/sa1100: Replace deprecated rtc_tm_to_time() and rtc_time_to_tm() Xunlei Pang
2015-04-29 23:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-29 14:32 ` [rtc-linux] " pang.xunlei
[not found] ` <OF1F6D43BC.C38481A0-ON48257E54.004FA90B-48257E54.004FD9D8@LocalDomain>
2015-05-30 10:05 ` pang.xunlei
2015-06-01 19:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-06-01 19:59 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-06-03 14:17 ` Alessandro Zummo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150601195909.GO4710@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=andrew.christian@hp.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cih@coventive.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=pang.xunlei@zte.com.cn \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=xlpang@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox