From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH] rtc: Add an option to invalidate dates in 2038
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 21:47:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160220204715.GJ2222@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160220194310.02964d5f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On 20/02/2016 at 19:43:10 +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote :
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:10:44 +0100
> Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > hctosys is setting the system time from the kernel. This means that 32bit
> > system can get their time set to a date after the 31bit time_t overflow.
> >
> > This is currently an issue as userspace is not yet ready to handle those
> > dates and may break. For example systemd's usage of timerfd shows that the
> > timerfd will always fire immediately because it can't be set at a date
> > after the current date.
> >
> > The new RTC_INVALID_2038 option will make sure that date after 03:09:07 on
> > Jan 19 2038 are invalid. This is 5 minutes before the 31bit overflow. This
> > leaves enough time for userspace to react and is short enough to make the
> > issue visible.
>
> This is kind of pointless. You replace loading the RTC and discovering
> the time isn't supported by your system with not loading he RTC and
> discovering your system clock is magically and almost un-debuggably
> wrong, and when something like NTP syncs it, breaks anyway.
>
> The only way to deal with 2038 is to fix your user space. People need to
> deal with reality, even if it's not all pink unicorns and rainbows.
>
Actually, I'm not trying to solve the 2038 issue.
But in the current state on 32 bit platforms, while the kernel is able
to handle a 64bit date, userspace is not. The main issue is that
distributions use HCTOSYS so if the RTC is set to a date after 2038
(which we know is currently bogus), the kernel will set a system time to
that date.
This result in a system that fails when using timerfd, The timerfd will
always fire immediately (until, as some people pointed out, we have
relative timers).
This is know to break systemd [1] but I have had reports for other
failing applications.
I understand this is a workaround and I plan to switch the default to n
once libc and critical userspace is able to handle 64 bit time.
The other way of solving that is to get back to a 32 bit time_t
internally until we switch the whole userspace to a 64 bit time_t but I
don't think this is practical.
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1143
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-20 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-20 19:10 [rtc-linux] [PATCH] rtc: Add an option to invalidate dates in 2038 Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-20 19:43 ` [rtc-linux] " One Thousand Gnomes
2016-02-20 20:47 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2016-02-20 22:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-20 23:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-20 23:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-21 12:40 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-02-22 13:00 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-22 13:43 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-02-22 15:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-22 15:56 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-22 16:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-22 16:40 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-02-22 16:41 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-02-22 16:58 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160220204715.GJ2222@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox