From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (mail.free-electrons.com. [62.4.15.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s128si316628wme.1.2016.12.05.02.06.31 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 02:06:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:06:30 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Amelie Delaunay Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gabriel.fernandez@st.com Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: document the STM32 RTC bindings Message-ID: <20161205100630.n3gldznf524pucjm@piout.net> References: <1480687801-19525-2-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <1480687801-19525-4-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <1480687801-19525-4-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Hi, On 02/12/2016 at 15:09:55 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote : > This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 RTC. > > Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4578838 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > +STM32 Real Time Clock > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "st,stm32-rtc". > +- reg: address range of rtc register set. > +- clocks: reference to the clock entry ck_rtc. > +- clock-names: name of the clock used. Should be "ck_rtc". Is this name really useful? > +- interrupt-parent: phandle for the interrupt controller. > +- interrupts: rtc alarm interrupt. > +- interrupt-names: rtc alarm interrupt name, should be "alarm". Same comment, is this name really useful? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.