From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com (mail-lf0-x244.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p138si80989wme.1.2016.12.05.14.03.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p100so27080094lfg.2 for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:03:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 23:03:52 +0100 From: Emil Bartczak To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 1/4] rtc: mcp795: fix invalid month setting. Message-ID: <20161205220352.GB15449@emba-laptop> References: <9d5792a4e183cdea55accd6747b55f54d9e9d6aa.1480939487.git.emilbart@gmail.com> <20161205150959.gx5ccrfcvb5an7lx@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <20161205150959.gx5ccrfcvb5an7lx@piout.net> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Hi, On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/12/2016 at 14:11:50 +0100, Emil Bartczak wrote : > > The 10 month register was always set to value 0 in the RTC hardware. > > Due to the bug month November or December became February. > > All your patches are missing your SoB, see Developer's Certificate of > Origin 1.1 in Documentation/SubmittingPatches Ok, I will fix it in the next patchset. Sorry for that simple mistakes but I'm newbie in sending patches. > > > --- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-mcp795.c | 12 +++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mcp795.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mcp795.c > > index 4021fd0..266328b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mcp795.c > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mcp795.c > > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ > > #define MCP795_EEWREN 0x06 > > #define MCP795_SRREAD 0x05 > > #define MCP795_SRWRITE 0x01 > > -#define MCP795_READ 0x13 > > +#define MCP795_READ 0x13 > > Unrelated change Ok, I will remove it from patch. > > > #define MCP795_WRITE 0x12 > > #define MCP795_UNLOCK 0x14 > > #define MCP795_IDWRITE 0x32 > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ > > > > #define MCP795_ST_BIT 0x80 > > #define MCP795_24_BIT 0x40 > > +#define MCP795_LP_BIT 0x20 > > > > static int mcp795_rtcc_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 *buf, u8 count) > > { > > @@ -108,7 +109,8 @@ static int mcp795_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tim) > > data[1] = (data[1] & 0x80) | ((tim->tm_min / 10) << 4) | (tim->tm_min % 10); > > data[2] = ((tim->tm_hour / 10) << 4) | (tim->tm_hour % 10); > > data[4] = ((tim->tm_mday / 10) << 4) | ((tim->tm_mday) % 10); > > - data[5] = (data[5] & 0x10) | (tim->tm_mon / 10) | (tim->tm_mon % 10); > > + data[5] = (data[5] & MCP795_LP_BIT) | > > You changed 0x10 in MCP795_LP_BIT which you defined as 0x20, is that > right? Yes, it should be 0x20 (checked in datasheet). > > This is also an unrelated change. > > > + ((tim->tm_mon / 10) << 4) | (tim->tm_mon % 10); What do you mean exactly? That above line of code was moved to the new line? Or that I added shift left operation (tim->tm_mon / 10) << 4)? Changing 0x10 to 0x20 and adding shift right operation fixes the problem. > > > > if (tim->tm_year > 100) > > tim->tm_year -= 100; > > @@ -137,11 +139,11 @@ static int mcp795_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tim) > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - tim->tm_sec = ((data[0] & 0x70) >> 4) * 10 + (data[0] & 0x0f); > > - tim->tm_min = ((data[1] & 0x70) >> 4) * 10 + (data[1] & 0x0f); > > + tim->tm_sec = ((data[0] & 0x70) >> 4) * 10 + (data[0] & 0x0f); > > + tim->tm_min = ((data[1] & 0x70) >> 4) * 10 + (data[1] & 0x0f); > > tim->tm_hour = ((data[2] & 0x30) >> 4) * 10 + (data[2] & 0x0f); > > tim->tm_mday = ((data[4] & 0x30) >> 4) * 10 + (data[4] & 0x0f); > > - tim->tm_mon = ((data[5] & 0x10) >> 4) * 10 + (data[5] & 0x0f); > > + tim->tm_mon = ((data[5] & 0x10) >> 4) * 10 + (data[5] & 0x0f); > > All those whitespace changes are actually confusing. Please do them in a > separate patch or in your last patch. Ok, I will have a separate patch for them. > > > tim->tm_year = ((data[6] & 0xf0) >> 4) * 10 + (data[6] & 0x0f) + 100; /* Assume we are in 20xx */ > > > > dev_dbg(dev, "Read from mcp795: %04d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com Cheers, Emil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.