From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com Received: from muru.com (muru.com. [72.249.23.125]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id y87si1288298pfk.14.2017.08.14.09.22.27 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:22:20 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Lee Jones , Thierry Reding , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Dmitry Torokhov , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Sebastian Reichel , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Thompson , Jingoo Han , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Peter Ujfalusi , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm Message-ID: <20170814162219.GX8569@atomide.com> References: <20170521220212.1404-1-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170521220212.1404-4-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20170706064453.GH16144@ulmo.fritz.box> <20170706070352.xdecvsnremwqed72@dell> <20170813133700.tv4ka7anvbzcplr7@ninjato> <20170814064247.qvggx4ito4vgjqvs@dell> <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" In-Reply-To: <20170814084340.65morabelapfegph@ninjato> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , * Wolfram Sang [170814 01:43]: > > > > Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply > > > this for 4.14? > > > > I can't apply anything without Acks for *all* of the subsystems above. > > Well, there are cases when you can. Those should be exceptions and well > justified, of course. > > > My suggestion would be to collect the Acks you've received up until > > this point and identify which SS's are still lacking in change log > > section of a RESEND. > > I agree, though, that I can try a second round to get the acks. As long as it's been compile tested with omap2plus_defconfig: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.