From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Gabriel Beddingfield <gabe@nestlabs.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Guy Erb <guy@nestlabs.com>,
hharte@nestlabs.com
Subject: Re: Extreme time jitter with suspend/resume cycles
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:08:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171005110808.GA19251@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLUO-62B0umVSUK979A+dApOLN3xt5nnZA5HKHsWnRz3KQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:16:31PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Gabriel Beddingfield <gabe@nestlabs.com> wrote:
> > We found that the problem is an interaction between the NTP code and
> > what I call the "delta_delta hack." (see [1] and [2]) This code
> > allocates a static variable in a function that contains an offset from
> > the system time to the persistent/rtc clock. It uses that time to
> > fudge the suspend timestamp so that on resume the sleep time will be
> > compensated. It's kind of a statistical hack that assumes things will
> > average out. It seems to have two main assumptions:
> >
> > 1. The persistent/rtc clock has only single-second precision
> > 2. The system does not frequently suspend/resume.
> > 3. If delta_delta is less than 2 seconds, these assumptions are "true"
> >
> > Because the delta_delta hack is trying to maintain an offset from the
> > system time to the persistent/rtc clock, any minor NTP corrections
> > that have occurred since the last suspend will be discarded. However,
> > the NTP subsystem isn't notified that this is happening -- and so it
> > causes some level of instability in its PLL logic.
This is interesting. What polling interval was ntpd using? If I
understand it correctly, with a high-resolution persistent clock the
delta-delta compensation should be very small and shouldn't disrupt
ntpd. Does this instability disappear when ntpd is not controlling the
clock (i.e. "disable ntp" in ntp.conf)?
> We should also figure out how to best handle ntpd in userspace dealing
> with frequent suspend/resume cycles. This is problematic, as the
> closest analogy is trying driving on the road while frequently falling
> asleep. This is not something I think ntpd handles well. I suspect
> our options are that any ntp adjustments being made might be made for
> far too long (causing potentially massive over-correction) or not at
> all, and not at all seems slightly better in my mind.
Yeah, controlling the clock in such conditions will be difficult. The
kernel/ntp PLL requires periodic updates. There is some code in
ntp_update_offset() that reduces the frequency adjustment when PLL
updates are missing, but I'm not actually sure if it works correctly
with suspend.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 16:11 Extreme time jitter with suspend/resume cycles Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-04 18:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-04 23:10 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 0:20 ` John Stultz
2017-10-05 16:46 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 11:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 16:47 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 18:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 20:51 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 21:12 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 21:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 0:16 ` John Stultz
2017-10-05 11:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-05 11:08 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2017-10-05 20:14 ` Gabriel Beddingfield
2017-10-05 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-15 6:39 ` Introduce clock precision to help time travelers was " Pavel Machek
2017-10-18 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2017-10-18 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2017-10-18 21:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-10-18 21:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-11-04 15:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171005110808.GA19251@localhost \
--to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gabe@nestlabs.com \
--cc=guy@nestlabs.com \
--cc=hharte@nestlabs.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).