From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745ABC07E85 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 23:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EDE20838 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 23:19:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544224761; bh=DKyBMtHgH4RkLeXZbPw3OU6Yzi7Fli9fVJxfoq7XMyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=oSVy5ZEcVyXf/znH3PdwNjD0M1gT7yPpnl+mY1ogin3iiXU/hNlK/v2NRNR+XubUw kYaj07FIgNanc1v6H59cnLmb1qUKoJ1CAs75B5PkkGDQjA8Ait0kR9O/TnQ93PQLo5 tyBK8rs8TW4r+mUiiND13B9FS+MYW6W9aOlpXxDc= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 34EDE20838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726047AbeLGXTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:19:20 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:38596 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725791AbeLGXTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2018 18:19:20 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id a77so4729455oii.5; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 15:19:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HNfRJAiRFxc1P8MQJ87MfpT7Sb6SzhIGgf2ybqBUVlA=; b=hlNdnPGpmyfybxXowJotmQJfPa4RcC+Vb+86Muia/VjQWEhp7eWI3584KEsCOa9CA9 sxX8nFXiMA3V++YlADwQWjkT2CVITGQYjtIga/TLdpnts4pw/yUeP1vc0W33SVioWpAd u8L9T+tUBXYy1YErsszvVVr0b6+yXFPmSuMmQMRU9d8BUqf+82/mVWYMNPULtiDPRbUV RBc1WHk0HHURs9TMKomGnYlVRLTIH8yWzVMEe9PcxWXTNxtaQpAxn5Gf0kg07UXF0G1Y 7+dZn6MVHHiYRVOy87uYjQwTw8diqb4mwQ3vmRwtzhB5TWSwRp94qRe98Eu0PNpFsmEM OdXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbyLRXcE93ZDK7sj225yYdtO1XlyFLmLX6D9f5Q4anSMFyuGbsv n2L936MQUi5ulMaQxJMbRg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Vioncqm3R7P+ZYJm69rjshXtzK+/j9ZUnGRG/GgrCbVoeEE1Zvyo7vAB7+khj6rJbVNRZK9w== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c46:: with SMTP id i6mr2316045oiy.208.1544224759778; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 15:19:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j11sm2084480oif.9.2018.12.07.15.19.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Dec 2018 15:19:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:19:18 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Biju Das Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Geert Uytterhoeven , Mark Rutland , Biju Das , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Chris Paterson , Srinivas Kandagatla , Fabrizio Castro , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] dt-bindings: rtc: pcf85363: Document pcf85263 real-time clock Message-ID: <20181207231918.GA18691@bogus> References: <1544182066-31528-1-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> <1544182066-31528-3-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1544182066-31528-3-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:27:43 +0000, Biju Das wrote: > The pcf85263 RTC is compatible with the pcf85363 RTC. > > The difference between the pcf85263 and pcf85363 RTC is that the latter has > 64 bytes more RAM. This renders them incompatible from a DT point of view. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > V1-->V2 > * Incorporated Simon's review comment. > V2-->V3 > * No Change. > V3-->V4 > * No Change. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/pcf85363.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring