From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA51AC4360F for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04FC2082E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727310AbfDDOLN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:11:13 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:44338 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726618AbfDDOLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:11:13 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C710080D4; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:11:09 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: Keerthy , alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, t-kristo@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, d-gerlach@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: mach-omap2: pm33xx: Add support for rtc+ddr in self refresh mode Message-ID: <20190404141108.GC49658@atomide.com> References: <20190322171619.4180-1-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20190322171619.4180-4-j-keerthy@ti.com> <20190401175245.GJ49658@atomide.com> <20190401203854.3b6ec1a2@kemnade.info> <20190401204033.GK49658@atomide.com> <20190404125111.3800e26d@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20190404125111.3800e26d@kemnade.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org * Andreas Kemnade [190404 10:53]: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:40:33 -0700 > Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Andreas Kemnade [190401 18:39]: > > > Could we somehow describe this property of the hardware > > > (is-offmode-capable or is-wired-for-offmode) as a separate devicetree > > > property of the soc? > > > > > > In mmc we have for example "cap-power-off-card" for > > > indicating some is-wired-suitable-for thing. > > > > And we also have "regulator-off-in-suspend". > > > > How about "soc-off-in-suspend" for the generic name? > > > Well, remember my "omap3: give off mode enable a more prominent place" > maybe we can use the same capability property for both proposes. Yes. I don't think we need a Kconfig option for it though. Seems just a device specific property should be enough for now. Regards, Tony