Re: [PATCH] rtc: stm32: One function call less in stm32_rtc_set_alarm()

[Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:17:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 22:10:10 +0200
> 
> Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
> a conditional statement.

... and a totally pointless use of the ternary operator.

> @@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>  	/* Write to Alarm register */
>  	writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar);
> 
> -	if (alrm->enabled)
> -		stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1);
> -	else
> -		stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0);
> -
> +	stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled ? 1 : 0);

If we look at stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable():

static int stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
{
...
	if (enabled)
		do A;
	else
		do B;
...
}

alrm->enabled is an unsigned char.  So, the above can be simplified to:

	stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled);

without any need what so ever to use the ternary operator.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up