From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: stm32: Use NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:33:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230816113326.1468435-1-geert@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n (e.g. m68k/allmodconfig):
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:904:12: error: ‘stm32_rtc_resume’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
904 | static int stm32_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:894:12: error: ‘stm32_rtc_suspend’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
894 | static int stm32_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indeed, the previous change mixed up the semantics between
SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS().
Fix this by using the modern NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() instead.
Reported-by: noreply@ellerman.id.au
Fixes: a69c610e13e2b2de ("rtc: stm32: remove incorrect #ifdef check")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 3ce4b3d08155b48d..76753c71d92eef3e 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
}
static const struct dev_pm_ops stm32_rtc_pm_ops = {
- SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(stm32_rtc_suspend, stm32_rtc_resume)
+ NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(stm32_rtc_suspend, stm32_rtc_resume)
};
static struct platform_driver stm32_rtc_driver = {
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 11:33 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2023-08-16 13:10 ` [PATCH] rtc: stm32: Use NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-15 22:16 Nathan Chancellor
2023-08-16 13:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-16 22:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230816113326.1468435-1-geert@linux-m68k.org \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=valentin.caron@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox