linux-rtc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: "Csókás Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
Cc: "Miroslav Lichvar" <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Szentendrei, Tamás" <szentendrei.tamas@prolan.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] rtc: pcf2127: Add PPS capability through Seconds Interrupt
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:01:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202406121101270f7d84a9@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0b6ad83-b9d4-43e7-8c1a-14b71a2060f8@prolan.hu>

On 12/06/2024 11:16:02+0200, Csókás Bence wrote:
> On 6/12/24 09:50, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:06:39PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 05:04:57PM +0200, Csókás, Bence wrote:
> > > 
> > > > PCF2127/29/31 is capable of generating an interrupt on every
> > > > second (SI) or minute (MI) change. It signals this through
> > > > the Minute/Second Flag (MSF) as well, which needs to be cleared.
> > > 
> > > This is a RFC, and my comment is that a PPS from an RTC is not useful
> > > to the Linux kernel.
> > 
> > I think a TCXO-based RTC can be useful to user space to improve
> > holdover performance with NTP/PTP.
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> > There already is the RTC_UIE_ON
> > ioctl to enable interrupts and receive them in user space.
> > 
> > The advantage of the PPS device over the ioctl would be more accurate
> > timestamping (kernel vs user-space). Should PPS be supported, it would
> > be nice if it worked generally with all drivers that support RTC_UIE_ON.
> 
> As we've discussed in v1, UIE hardware support is being removed from the RTC
> subsystem, which I tried to optionally re-introduce. Since there was no
> response since then, I assumed that there is no willingness to do that, so I
> chose the next best option, the PPS subsystem.

I won't reintroduce UIE but I'm going to fix the issue you see with the
pcf2129.

> 
> On 5/28/24 19:56, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > This has been removed from the kernel 13 years ago. What is your use
> > case to reintroduce it?
> 
> I also agree that multiple RTCs would benefit from this feature. However, we
> should only add it to those which *have* hardware support for a "one second
> has elapsed" signal. UIE is currently implemented by setting an alarm to the
> next second, which didn't work well with the PCF2129.

I agree with Miroslav that if done, this should be subsystem wise and
not just for individual drivers.



> 
> Bence
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-11 15:04 [RFC PATCH v2] rtc: pcf2127: Add PPS capability through Seconds Interrupt Csókás, Bence
2024-06-12  5:06 ` Richard Cochran
2024-06-12  7:50   ` Miroslav Lichvar
2024-06-12  9:16     ` Csókás Bence
2024-06-12 11:01       ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2024-06-13  3:25       ` Richard Cochran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202406121101270f7d84a9@mail.local \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=csokas.bence@prolan.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=szentendrei.tamas@prolan.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).