Re: [PATCH] mfd: rtc: bd7xxxx Drop IC name from IRQ

[Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > A few ROHM PMICs have an RTC block which can be controlled by the
> > rtc-bd70528 driver. The RTC driver needs the alarm interrupt information
> > from the parent MFD driver. The MFD driver provides the interrupt
> > information as a set of named interrupts, where the name is of form:
> > <PMIC model>-rtc-alm-<x>, where x is an alarm block number.
> > 
> > From the RTC driver point of view it is irrelevant what the PMIC name
> > is. It is sufficient to know this is alarm interrupt for a block X. The
> > PMIC model information is carried to RTC via the platform device ID.
> > Hence, having the PMIC model in the interrupt name is only making things
> > more complex because the RTC driver needs to request differently named
> > interrupts on different PMICs, making code unnecessary complicated.
> > 
> > Simplify this slightly by always using the RTC driver name 'bd70528' as
> > the prefix for alarm interrupts, no matter what the exact PMIC model is,
> > and always request the alarm interrupts of same name no matter what the
> > PMIC model is.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > This contains both the RTC and MFD changes in order to not break the
> > functionality between commits to different subsystems.
> 
> I can take it with an RTC Ack and an indication whether an immutable
> branch should be created and shared.

I fear this may have fallen from Alexandre's queue.

Please submit as a RESEND.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]