From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtc: rzn1: implement one-second accuracy for alarms
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:08:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305101038.9933-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> (raw)
The hardware alarm only supports one-minute accuracy which is coarse and
disables UIE usage. Use the 1-second interrupt to achieve per-second
accuracy. It is activated once we hit the per-minute alarm. The new
feature is optional. When there is no 1-second interrupt, old behaviour
with per-minute accuracy is used as before. With this feature, all tests
of 'rtctest' are successfully passed.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
Tested with the Renesas RZ/N1D board. Besides 'rtctest', I did some
manual testing with 'rtc' on top trying to stresstest corner cases.
Looking forward to comments. AFAICS, this is the first driver trying to
overcome the per-minute limitation using 1-second interrupts.
Change since v1:
* consider 1s interrupt when setting the alarm->enabled flag
drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
index cb220807d925..eeb9612a666f 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rzn1.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/rtc.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL0 0x00
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL0_SLSB_SUBU 0
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL0_CE BIT(7)
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL1 0x04
+#define RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE BIT(3)
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME BIT(4)
#define RZN1_RTC_CTL2 0x08
@@ -58,6 +60,13 @@
struct rzn1_rtc {
struct rtc_device *rtcdev;
void __iomem *base;
+ /*
+ * Protects access to RZN1_RTC_CTL1 reg. rtc_lock with threaded_irqs
+ * would introduce race conditions when switching interrupts because
+ * of potential sleeps
+ */
+ spinlock_t ctl1_access_lock;
+ struct rtc_time tm_alarm;
};
static void rzn1_rtc_get_time_snapshot(struct rzn1_rtc *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)
@@ -135,8 +144,38 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
static irqreturn_t rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct rzn1_rtc *rtc = dev_id;
+ u32 ctl1, set_irq_bits = 0;
+
+ if (rtc->tm_alarm.tm_sec == 0)
+ rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtcdev, 1, RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
+ else
+ /* Switch to 1s interrupts */
+ set_irq_bits = RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE;
- rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtcdev, 1, RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
+ guard(spinlock)(&rtc->ctl1_access_lock);
+
+ ctl1 = readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ ctl1 &= ~RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME;
+ ctl1 |= set_irq_bits;
+ writel(ctl1, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t rzn1_rtc_1s_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct rzn1_rtc *rtc = dev_id;
+ u32 ctl1;
+
+ if (readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_SECC) == bin2bcd(rtc->tm_alarm.tm_sec)) {
+ guard(spinlock)(&rtc->ctl1_access_lock);
+
+ ctl1 = readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ ctl1 &= ~RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE;
+ writel(ctl1, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+
+ rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtcdev, 1, RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
+ }
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -144,14 +183,38 @@ static irqreturn_t rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
static int rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enable)
{
struct rzn1_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- u32 ctl1 = readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ struct rtc_time *tm = &rtc->tm_alarm, tm_now;
+ u32 ctl1;
+ int ret;
- if (enable)
- ctl1 |= RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME;
- else
- ctl1 &= ~RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME;
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&rtc->ctl1_access_lock);
- writel(ctl1, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ ctl1 = readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+
+ if (enable) {
+ /*
+ * Use alarm interrupt if alarm time is at least a minute away
+ * or less than a minute but in the next minute. Otherwise use
+ * 1 second interrupt to wait for the proper second
+ */
+ do {
+ ctl1 &= ~(RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME | RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE);
+
+ ret = rzn1_rtc_read_time(dev, &tm_now);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (rtc_tm_sub(tm, &tm_now) > 59 || tm->tm_min != tm_now.tm_min)
+ ctl1 |= RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME;
+ else
+ ctl1 |= RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE;
+
+ writel(ctl1, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ } while (readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_SECC) != bin2bcd(tm_now.tm_sec));
+ } else {
+ ctl1 &= ~(RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME | RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE);
+ writel(ctl1, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -185,7 +248,7 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
}
ctl1 = readl(rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
- alrm->enabled = !!(ctl1 & RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME);
+ alrm->enabled = !!(ctl1 & (RZN1_RTC_CTL1_ALME | RZN1_RTC_CTL1_1SE));
return 0;
}
@@ -216,6 +279,8 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
writel(bin2bcd(tm->tm_hour), rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_ALH);
writel(BIT(wday), rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_ALW);
+ rtc->tm_alarm = alrm->time;
+
rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled);
return 0;
@@ -304,7 +369,7 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops rzn1_rtc_ops = {
static int rzn1_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct rzn1_rtc *rtc;
- int alarm_irq;
+ int irq;
int ret;
rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rtc), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -317,9 +382,9 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(rtc->base))
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rtc->base), "Missing reg\n");
- alarm_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (alarm_irq < 0)
- return alarm_irq;
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "alarm");
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return irq;
rtc->rtcdev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtcdev))
@@ -329,8 +394,6 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rtc->rtcdev->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2099;
rtc->rtcdev->alarm_offset_max = 7 * 86400;
rtc->rtcdev->ops = &rzn1_rtc_ops;
- set_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_MINUTE, rtc->rtcdev->features);
- clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_UPDATE_INTERRUPT, rtc->rtcdev->features);
ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -349,13 +412,24 @@ static int rzn1_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Disable all interrupts */
writel(0, rtc->base + RZN1_RTC_CTL1);
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, alarm_irq, rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
- dev_name(&pdev->dev), rtc);
+ spin_lock_init(&rtc->ctl1_access_lock);
+
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, rzn1_rtc_alarm_irq, 0, "RZN1 RTC Alarm", rtc);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "RTC timer interrupt not available\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "RTC alarm interrupt not available\n");
goto dis_runtime_pm;
}
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "pps");
+ if (irq >= 0)
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, rzn1_rtc_1s_irq, 0, "RZN1 RTC 1s", rtc);
+
+ if (irq < 0 || ret) {
+ set_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM_RES_MINUTE, rtc->rtcdev->features);
+ clear_bit(RTC_FEATURE_UPDATE_INTERRUPT, rtc->rtcdev->features);
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "RTC pps interrupt not available. Alarm has only minute accuracy\n");
+ }
+
ret = devm_rtc_register_device(rtc->rtcdev);
if (ret)
goto dis_runtime_pm;
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 10:08 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-03-05 22:06 ` [PATCH v2] rtc: rzn1: implement one-second accuracy for alarms Alexandre Belloni
2025-03-07 6:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-07 18:38 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-03-08 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-10 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-10 9:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-17 22:24 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-03-19 7:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-17 22:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305101038.9933-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox