From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6F95230D1E; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749767650; cv=none; b=aBaNIaEbbbBKJrsNRfDliSqhHOR8kRj/Mw3rdnGEDUHAz5TgR7FdKJRak5Oj8sZhGywW6TROIdj1YhjZ84HFh3umgoEWiAO2l5zznCkH4vAMVoPyyD3MA5a7e52DqG6BtYXJLowz88oJ68FXrTbN5G9UkWAfJVXu4afRphm9XXA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749767650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NKWTLr65Hcmg0MMBeQ2Z/lSxWCh4uYG9hCxq/seIme8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E3KKZk+TC4tp9l/9ZjGl2enSNqlhD0/dt0J/OKbpZtBQLpoxTd2qjgjRgSfxRIhL/G4vz5ga5zNrmvC8ROYeSrBdsnGCKH+lGDLA7wbRq0Ib9gqSrQYD1nUFftW7apmFIzVsDUp9S5WbzseDX7H6v0dirsh5IAzc4A0RIqLGBP8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=chZHuC9c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="chZHuC9c" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1749767648; x=1781303648; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=NKWTLr65Hcmg0MMBeQ2Z/lSxWCh4uYG9hCxq/seIme8=; b=chZHuC9ci33WHPbsRz8MFaf0u51tfoerzpMLyTBaHTIgm4PcXCoRetm3 NWZfGK/pmT4Ga1XhRxmKJhx6w17mfkOm4NNS5tMN9DhL92BDTIb+heS10 UupcTgYRYUgdzYGdMszYhxsaO8/VMFKmZg7j3QA/imhLVT4MydtPt5gUj SYyZngNIw2Lmn9/dJtm0eeBHK+20jlcBmzDfl+W0rvs1ZkJeze7Hoe7p/ OaSx2MFdg+8YjgnG53riF4Ucm9SLUkAS71hd6fW3q794z5ydJIBUVtxSA xuImIrKm2JNZQrEtJOlfHvo6wjaDNVAkzWwaB9Gfv888ANgXENdgVXTNA w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kvidIT0vQoeCDsmC+f8eVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CilzCWI1SauycZt7+LLmQQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11462"; a="55771878" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,231,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55771878" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jun 2025 15:34:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IgjqehKISRuLCpQGukBFWw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /5HrnusNQSmAq6DS1AB4Iw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,231,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="184892812" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e8142ee1dce2) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2025 15:34:06 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e8142ee1dce2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uPqUl-000C0I-30; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 22:34:03 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:33:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ming Wang , Alexandre Belloni , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Huacai Chen , lixuefeng@loongson.cn, chenhuacai@loongson.cn, gaojuxin@loongson.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: efi: Defer driver initialization to prioritize more capable RTCs Message-ID: <202506130610.5rhXSP5U-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250611062025.3243732-1-wangming01@loongson.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250611062025.3243732-1-wangming01@loongson.cn> Hi Ming, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on abelloni/rtc-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20250612] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ming-Wang/rtc-efi-Defer-driver-initialization-to-prioritize-more-capable-RTCs/20250611-142308 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611062025.3243732-1-wangming01%40loongson.cn patch subject: [PATCH] rtc: efi: Defer driver initialization to prioritize more capable RTCs config: arm-multi_v7_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250613/202506130610.5rhXSP5U-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250613/202506130610.5rhXSP5U-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506130610.5rhXSP5U-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: drivers/rtc/rtc-efi: section mismatch in reference: efi_rtc_driver+0x0 (section: .data) -> efi_rtc_probe (section: .init.text) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki