From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57FE2248F7D; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758027960; cv=none; b=pSeFOa5Ts601meHeAI4JltVTPDhKF/k4+QW6N4eNZrF6kOKWjqqRaD7aMkytwWMngmE3hsT5wtY0I5Pi9Mf8vqQJIMkYnC9u+U38O0gbkQl7Z7dYkiUGICklMRdOOyraOJldDSykWUagb6RUOf6hgDyXqG9sXRzo8dttr89xAmM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758027960; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7PFeQhGub4pc5GdZaWttUgFBwNnytLn3zDlqurXe9Zw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q1zDHrH0/MuMzhJnVnvsAPQs4RJQXrRYGJ6J/djLquOya0ZG7C9r61VBvZc1I9duTwBVK7jAiQhwfJmf4EHAyC13bywOElUjN+407X6rMATi25eVs/mk8lp53DLKEoQNZC52LM6fCbcZ0JtugrXJTNyAWCTx/1FtUHrkcdgej3s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: from localhost (unknown [180.158.240.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dlan) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6061A340E10; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:05:53 +0800 From: Yixun Lan To: Lee Jones Cc: Mark Brown , Alex Elder , lgirdwood@gmail.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mat.jonczyk@o2.pl, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux.amoon@gmail.com, troymitchell988@gmail.com, guodong@riscstar.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v13 0/7] spacemit: introduce P1 PMIC support Message-ID: <20250916130553-GYC1255161@gentoo.org> References: <20250825172057.163883-1-elder@riscstar.com> <175690199980.2656286.5459018179105557107.b4-ty@kernel.org> <7aba368e-709b-49b0-b62c-f2f8250c8628@sirena.org.uk> <20250916084229.GG1637058@google.com> <20250916122724.GB3585920@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250916122724.GB3585920@google.com> Hi Mark, Jones, On 13:27 Tue 16 Sep , Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 09:42:29AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:36:41AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > > > > > > How should these two patches be merged? Mark has reviewed the > > > > > regulator patch 3 and Alexandre has acked the RTC patch 4. > > > > > > We'd both have been expecting them to go via MFD. > > > > > Why? I don't see any dependencies between them (usually a shared MFD > > > header-file). If there are no deps, it should be taken through its own > > > repo, no? > > > > I used to just apply things but at some point Linus complained about > > cases where the MFD ended up not getting merged (missing the merge > > window or whatever) so I've been treating them like they had an actual > > dependency. > > Not sure I've seen any of that from Linus, but I don't doubt you. The > MFD part has been merged now, so it's save to go ahead and apply the > Regulator part. > Forgive me to chim in.. To be honest, I don't really mind which tree the patch to go through.. But since the patch 3 has no build time dependency on previous two, so it should be fair to take via pmu/regulator tree, I've done a check locally which imply this.. What do you think, Mark? -- Yixun Lan (dlan)