From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Devang Tailor <dev.tailor@samsung.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
henrik@grimler.se, faraz.ata@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2025 23:42:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510052142538d7fd672@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905110554.2212304-1-dev.tailor@samsung.com>
On 05/09/2025 16:35:51+0530, Devang Tailor wrote:
> Enable on-chip RTC support. The on-chip RTC of this SoC is similar
> to the previous version of Samsung SoCs except for TICNT tick time
> counter. So re-use the existing RTC driver with applicable call-backs
> for initialization and IRQ handling without accessing TICNT counter.
>
> As suggested in review comment, instead of adding separate disable()
> call-back, re-used the existing s3c24xx_rtc_disable() by adding a new
> bool 'use_s3c2410_ticnt' in rtc_data to avoid accessing TICNT counter
> which is not valid for RTC of ExynosAutov9.
>
> Setting and getting hardware clock has been tested using 'hwclock'
> and 'date' utilities.
>
> Alarm interrupt has been checked with incrementing interrupt
> count via "cat /proc/interrupts | grep rtc" for 10sec
> wakeup time via "echo +10 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm"
>
> changelog
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - 1/3 : Added Tag 'Reviewed-by'
> - 2/3 : Fixed the review comment of v2 to re-use the existing disable()
> instead of adding new one.
> : Not adding Tag 'Reviewed-by' from V2 since the patch has been
> changed
> - 3/3 : Added Tag 'Reviewed-by'
> link for v2 : https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20250710083434.1821671-1-dev.tailor@samsung.com/
>
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed the review comment of v1 for mis-aligmnent & asymmetry bit logic.
> - link for v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20250702052426.2404256-1-dev.tailor@samsung.com/
>
>
> Devang Tailor (3):
> dt-bindings: rtc: s3c-rtc: add compatible for exynosautov9
> rtc: s3c: support for exynosautov9 on-chip RTC
> arm64: dts: exynosautov9: add RTC DT node
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/s3c-rtc.yaml | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9-sadk.dts | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi | 10 +++++++++
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 4ac65880ebca1b68495bd8704263b26c050ac010
You should rebase on top of rtc-next as s3c2410 support has been
removed.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-05 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250905105708epcas5p159281b73f87fae88e824b97889908649@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-09-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] On-chip RTC support for ExynosAutov9 Devang Tailor
[not found] ` <CGME20250905105710epcas5p10516745944f09e262f41a5e5dcfce5f8@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-09-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: s3c-rtc: add compatible for exynosautov9 Devang Tailor
[not found] ` <CGME20250905105712epcas5p35b5f24b8570c050b7ee675cb26f8ce43@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-09-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rtc: s3c: support for exynosautov9 on-chip RTC Devang Tailor
2025-09-05 14:03 ` Henrik Grimler
[not found] ` <CGME20250905105714epcas5p4bb26e232702a9dff37e87dfd07da3946@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2025-09-05 11:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: exynosautov9: add RTC DT node Devang Tailor
2025-10-05 21:42 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510052142538d7fd672@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.tailor@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=faraz.ata@samsung.com \
--cc=henrik@grimler.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).