From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
Cc: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] rtc: spacemit: default module when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is enabled
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 23:36:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260109223627b566d2b0@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ca28183-1687-4ddc-8b3c-5e5be4255561@riscstar.com>
On 29/12/2025 19:46:59-0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 12/29/25 6:51 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 29/12/2025 12:02:23-0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> > > On 12/25/25 10:53 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > On 25/12/2025 15:46:33+0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> > > > > The RTC driver defaulted to the same value as MFD_SPACEMIT_P1, which
> > > > > caused it to be built-in automatically whenever the PMIC support was
> > > > > set to y.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is not always desirable, as the RTC function is not required on
> > > > > all platforms using the SpacemiT P1 PMIC.
> > > >
> > > > But then, can't people simply change the config? I don't feel like
> > > > this is an improvement.
> > >
> > > It's not an improvement for people who want to use the SpacemiT
> > > P1 PMIC, but it's an improvement for all the other RISC-V builds
> > > using "defconfig" that would rather have that support be modular
> > > to avoid needlessly consuming resources.
> >
> > But then, wouldn't MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 be simply not set or set to m ? So
> > this doesn't have any impact on other RISC-V builds while it makes
> > people using the SpacemiT P1 PMIC jump through hoops to be able to use
> > the RTC as this is a very uncommon way to set default values.
> >
> > My point is:
> > - other RISC-V platforms would simply not select MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 or
> > have MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 set to m
> > - having RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 built-in by default when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
> > is built-in doesn't really hurt any SpacemiT P1 users but would be
> > the expectation of those using the RTC.
>
> The "hurt" isn't about P1 users, it's about everyone else.
>
> > - those wanting to optimise because they won't use the RTC, they can
> > already simply unselect RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 or set it to m.
>
>
> The purpose is to make the driver a module (not built-in)
> when "defconfig" is used (without the need for any Kconfig
> fragments to unselect things).
>
>
> In arch/riscv/configs/defconfig, we have this:
> CONFIG_ARCH_SPACEMIT=y
>
> In drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig, we have this
> (added by patch 2 in this series):
> config MFD_SPACEMIT_P1
> default m if ARCH_SPACEMIT
>
> So when using defconfig (alone), MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is set to m,
> to benefit non-SpacemiT RISC-V platforms.
>
> This patch is trying to do the same thing for the RTC,
> i.e. having RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 be defined as a module
> by default.
>
> I think you understand.
I'm sorry, I must be dumb but I don't understand. The current behaviour
is that when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is m, then the default value for
RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 will be m. Since patch 2 makes it exactly that way
(MFD_SPACEMIT_P set to m), I don't get why it is necessary to mess with
the default of RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1.
The current default behaviour of RTC_DRV_SPACEMIT_P1 seems to be the
correct one and the proper fix is then patch 2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-25 7:46 [PATCH v4 0/3] spacemit: fix P1 sub-device Kconfig defaults and dependencies Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] regulator: spacemit: MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 as dependencies Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mfd: simple-mfd-i2c: add default value Troy Mitchell
2026-01-09 16:41 ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2025-12-25 7:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] rtc: spacemit: default module when MFD_SPACEMIT_P1 is enabled Troy Mitchell
2025-12-25 16:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-12-29 18:02 ` Alex Elder
2025-12-30 0:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-12-30 1:46 ` Alex Elder
2026-01-09 22:36 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2026-01-11 19:55 ` Alex Elder
2026-01-12 1:49 ` Troy Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260109223627b566d2b0@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spacemit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox