From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DA624B28; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768437757; cv=none; b=Sf58izQ2dXVY8KsENloieTHWz32NyC2U1M8AHwOYQvJKCpMEKLKfIj2V/GwxsWcxF2YiuO8YvEeiOynpZTSQ/ojuwVZeYs2cpSlWTfqMDkkaKSQM68uqwv+W/qR1QoBHY2OaSYw8TAJqvEQkZuDwDOuj+SPE7dSchJYmSGzwJJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768437757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=46ZrE0WMU4jUx8qBB1E6yFTcAcqcMpFbiNSws0WY6xE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SXHfA9RdDvl+OTUe5cHCYYCWzSbapvIBQ36G+99nisU3raaHOzsBJUMc35v2VaREJc5xik7WcycGLvdAD9yFy4Hv2ED6BRnyhpJUOBcgdmrc04XK5S75xPv/67Y2AnQ1fguU0fxeAfTSh3VuBlhxuGPK2zthoV+Jv+zmGYCYXrQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=RAE7WdvS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="RAE7WdvS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768437757; x=1799973757; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=46ZrE0WMU4jUx8qBB1E6yFTcAcqcMpFbiNSws0WY6xE=; b=RAE7WdvSi2dpIvU9TvzRTdpgMJU30e5U5mNIE885OlSRHVod19BYH2m0 qy03n7Crpav4AQmaPAckPWJrFhHWsWVVfcQzcIEs6x8LdBT3QabyClsMj qX4YWJv9R4n/M+20TtjTtNqQ/YsDhwCPymcPWZXt1lYXtTkMb0b+iX+bd nZ8dQvC57fK0FdsLBzc3ONEt4RuDrTvjUrkPE4Cdnq9obPsNQiSrHcjMS wsEwt3CsZRuoXoZJApxzXwvMyTzpbgs6kjq4RA5iF1GZ9kcbD4BAGb/jB C6hJvk8XgKx1+YcWD566y2cmax2rdgokL7K8nyigXeONdICcdYTdhXmmt Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NuL7KKmcSPeyQ8Lk/HoSBw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0Z7JCxrOQXmjWF8uAWFZmw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11671"; a="92418345" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,226,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="92418345" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2026 16:42:37 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: A342G+IkTnKFu9368MOmLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4sccYvdRSD+XgoGS7afEUA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,226,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="235541231" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 765f4a05e27f) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2026 16:42:34 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 765f4a05e27f with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vgBRY-00000000HGq-0FRf; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:42:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:42:01 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Tomas Melin , Alexandre Belloni , Michal Simek Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomas Melin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: zynqmp: rework read_offset Message-ID: <202601150836.Yk8DcSZW-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260108-zynqmp-rtc-updates-v2-3-864c161fa83d@vaisala.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260108-zynqmp-rtc-updates-v2-3-864c161fa83d@vaisala.com> Hi Tomas, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on abelloni/rtc-next] [also build test ERROR on xilinx-xlnx/master linus/master v6.19-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tomas-Melin/rtc-zynqmp-check-calibration-max-value/20260108-223800 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260108-zynqmp-rtc-updates-v2-3-864c161fa83d%40vaisala.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: zynqmp: rework read_offset config: arm-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150836.Yk8DcSZW-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260115/202601150836.Yk8DcSZW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601150836.Yk8DcSZW-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/spi/spi-amlogic-spifc-a4.o: in function `aml_sfc_set_bus_width': spi-amlogic-spifc-a4.c:(.text.aml_sfc_set_bus_width+0x8c): undefined reference to `__ffsdi2' arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: spi-amlogic-spifc-a4.c:(.text.aml_sfc_set_bus_width+0xac): undefined reference to `__ffsdi2' arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: spi-amlogic-spifc-a4.c:(.text.aml_sfc_set_bus_width+0xcc): undefined reference to `__ffsdi2' arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/rtc/rtc-zynqmp.o: in function `xlnx_rtc_read_offset': >> rtc-zynqmp.c:(.text.xlnx_rtc_read_offset+0xd0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_ldivmod' >> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: rtc-zynqmp.c:(.text.xlnx_rtc_read_offset+0x15c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_ldivmod' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki