From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] rtc: ac100: convert from divider_round_rate() to divider_determine_rate()
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 01:26:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202601220026092a75a45e@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260108-clk-divider-round-rate-v1-3-535a3ed73bf3@redhat.com>
Hello,
On 08/01/2026 16:16:21-0500, Brian Masney wrote:
> The divider_round_rate() function is now deprecated, so let's migrate
> to divider_determine_rate() instead so that this deprecated API can be
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
> index 33626311fa781b5ce90dcc472f948dc933bbc897..16aca4431da8c029e6195d8a3c9fe75fa95d0bc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ac100.c
> @@ -140,42 +140,16 @@ static unsigned long ac100_clkout_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH);
> }
>
> -static long ac100_clkout_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> - unsigned long prate)
> -{
> - unsigned long best_rate = 0, tmp_rate, tmp_prate;
> - int i;
> -
> - if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE)
> - return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &prate, NULL,
> - AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
> - CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
> -
> - for (i = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[i].div; i++) {
> - tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[i].val);
> - tmp_rate = divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &tmp_prate, NULL,
> - AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
> - CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
> -
> - if (tmp_rate > rate)
> - continue;
> - if (rate - tmp_rate < best_rate - tmp_rate)
> - best_rate = tmp_rate;
> - }
> -
> - return best_rate;
> -}
> -
> static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> struct clk_rate_request *req)
> {
> - struct clk_hw *best_parent;
> + int i, ret, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> + struct clk_hw *best_parent = NULL;
> unsigned long best = 0;
> - int i, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
> struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i);
> - unsigned long tmp, prate;
> + unsigned long prate;
>
> /*
> * The clock has two parents, one is a fixed clock which is
> @@ -199,13 +173,40 @@ static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>
> prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>
> - tmp = ac100_clkout_round_rate(hw, req->rate, prate);
> -
> - if (tmp > req->rate)
> - continue;
> - if (req->rate - tmp < req->rate - best) {
> - best = tmp;
> - best_parent = parent;
> + if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE) {
> + struct clk_rate_request div_req = *req;
> +
> + div_req.best_parent_rate = prate;
> +
> + ret = divider_determine_rate(hw, &div_req, NULL,
> + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
> + if (ret != 0 || div_req.rate > req->rate)
> + continue;
This leaves a braces inbalance
> + else if (req->rate - div_req.rate < req->rate - best) {
> + best = div_req.rate;
> + best_parent = parent;
> + }
> + } else {
> + int j;
> +
> + for (j = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[j].div; j++) {
> + struct clk_rate_request div_req = *req;
> + unsigned long tmp_prate;
> +
> + tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[j].div);
> + div_req.best_parent_rate = tmp_prate;
> +
> + ret = divider_determine_rate(hw, &div_req, NULL,
> + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
> + if (ret != 0 || div_req.rate > req->rate)
> + continue;
Ditto.
> + else if (req->rate - div_req.rate < req->rate - best) {
> + best = div_req.rate;
> + best_parent = parent;
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-22 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-08 21:16 [PATCH 00/27] clk: remove deprecated API divider_round_rate() and friends Brian Masney
2026-01-08 21:16 ` [PATCH 03/27] rtc: ac100: convert from divider_round_rate() to divider_determine_rate() Brian Masney
2026-01-22 0:26 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2026-01-22 0:48 ` Brian Masney
2026-01-22 2:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-01-10 19:11 ` (subset) [PATCH 00/27] clk: remove deprecated API divider_round_rate() and friends Bjorn Andersson
2026-01-15 21:05 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-01-21 22:53 ` Brian Masney
2026-02-04 15:44 ` (subset) " Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202601220026092a75a45e@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox