Linux RTC
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: rtc: fix flaky date_read_loop test
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 17:01:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615150119ee47a1aa@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430120313.4078185-1-wakel@google.com>

On 30/04/2026 20:03:13+0800, Wake Liu wrote:
> The test case rtc.date_read_loop in rtctest.c fails intermittently because
> it checks that the RTC time does not advance by more than 1 second per loop
> iteration. However, the loop sleeps for 11ms via nanosleep(), and if the
> test thread is descheduled by the OS scheduler (e.g., under heavy system
> load in a VM), more than 1 second can elapse between consecutive RTC reads.
> This causes the next RTC time read to be 2 or more seconds ahead of the
> previous read, triggering a test assertion failure.
> 
> To make the test more resilient against OS scheduling delays, measure the
> real elapsed time between iterations using a monotonic clock
> (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)), and compute the actual number of seconds
> elapsed (delta_s) between consecutive RTC reads. Then dynamically adjust
> the assertion to:
> ASSERT_GE(prev_rtc_read + delta_s + 1, rtc_read);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>

Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>



> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> index 8047d9879039..54eb5c255a45 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, date_read_loop, READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC + 2) {
>  	long iter_count = 0;
>  	struct rtc_time rtc_tm;
>  	time_t start_rtc_read, prev_rtc_read;
> +	struct timespec prev_mono, cur_mono;
>  
>  	if (self->fd == -1 && errno == ENOENT)
>  		SKIP(return, "Skipping test since %s does not exist", rtc_file);
> @@ -126,25 +127,31 @@ TEST_F_TIMEOUT(rtc, date_read_loop, READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC + 2) {
>  
>  	rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &rtc_tm);
>  	ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
> +	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &prev_mono);
>  	start_rtc_read = rtc_time_to_timestamp(&rtc_tm);
>  	prev_rtc_read = start_rtc_read;
>  
>  	do  {
>  		time_t rtc_read;
> +		time_t delta_s = 0;
>  
>  		rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &rtc_tm);
>  		ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
> +		clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &cur_mono);
>  
>  		rtc_read = rtc_time_to_timestamp(&rtc_tm);
> +		delta_s = cur_mono.tv_sec - prev_mono.tv_sec;
> +
>  		/* Time should not go backwards */
>  		ASSERT_LE(prev_rtc_read, rtc_read);
> -		/* Time should not increase more then 1s at a time */
> -		ASSERT_GE(prev_rtc_read + 1, rtc_read);
> +		/* Time should not increase more then elapsed time + 1s */
> +		ASSERT_GE(prev_rtc_read + delta_s + 1, rtc_read);
>  
>  		/* Sleep 11ms to avoid killing / overheating the RTC */
>  		nanosleep_with_retries(READ_LOOP_SLEEP_MS * 1000000);
>  
>  		prev_rtc_read = rtc_read;
> +		prev_mono = cur_mono;
>  		iter_count++;
>  	} while (prev_rtc_read <= start_rtc_read + READ_LOOP_DURATION_SEC);
>  
> -- 
> 2.54.0.545.g6539524ca2-goog
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 12:03 [PATCH] selftests: rtc: fix flaky date_read_loop test Wake Liu
2026-06-15  3:21 ` Wake Liu
2026-06-15 15:01 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260615150119ee47a1aa@mail.local \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wakel@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox