Linux RTC
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] rtc: stmp3xxx: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:04:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728010457.ED2581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728005303.574936-1-rosenp@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Low] The local variable `irq_alarm` is used in `stmp3xxx_rtc_probe()` without being declared.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The dynamically registered child watchdog device is not unregistered when the RTC driver is unbound, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Incorrect devm cleanup order creates a race condition where a pending interrupt can trigger a Use-After-Free by re-queueing an already-canceled work object.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCHv2] rtc: stmp3xxx: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() ---
commit 9966c4bcfecfb31f7bf74af8e9b176bb32e74820
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

rtc: stmp3xxx: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()

This patch refactors the driver to use devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
instead of open-coding the resource lookup and mapping. It moves the
mapping ahead of the data allocation to handle deferred probes earlier.
It also removes irq_alarm from the private struct and adds an error
check for platform_get_irq().

> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
> index 7afcd14aeee56..e789458ba96a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stmp3xxx.c
> @@ -245,29 +244,25 @@ static void stmp3xxx_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  static int stmp3xxx_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data *rtc_data;
> -	struct resource *r;
> +	void __iomem *io;
>  	u32 rtc_stat;
>  	u32 pers0_set, pers0_clr;
>  	u32 crystalfreq = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	irq_alarm = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);

[Severity: Low]
Does this regression introduce a build failure?

The variable irq_alarm was removed from the private struct stmp3xxx_rtc_data,
but it is used here without being declared as a local int variable first.

> +	if (irq_alarm < 0)
> +		return irq_alarm;
> +
> +	io = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);

[ ... ]

> @@ -354,13 +349,10 @@ static int stmp3xxx_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(rtc_data->rtc))
>  		return PTR_ERR(rtc_data->rtc);
>  
> -	err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc_data->irq_alarm,
> +	err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_alarm,
>  			stmp3xxx_rtc_interrupt, 0, "RTC alarm", &pdev->dev);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this devm initialization
order create a use-after-free race condition during driver unbind?

The IRQ is requested via devm_request_irq() before the RTC device is
registered via devm_rtc_register_device() further down in probe.

During driver removal, devres cleans up in reverse order: the RTC device is
unregistered first (which cancels the irqwork), and the IRQ is freed second.

If a pending hardware interrupt fires in the window between these two steps,
could stmp3xxx_rtc_interrupt() unconditionally call rtc_update_irq(), which
re-queues the irqwork on an RTC device that is about to be freed?

> -	if (err) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot claim IRQ%d\n",
> -			rtc_data->irq_alarm);
> +	if (err)
>  		return err;
> -	}
>  
>  	rtc_data->rtc->ops = &stmp3xxx_rtc_ops;
>  	rtc_data->rtc->range_max = U32_MAX;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the dynamically registered watchdog
device leak on driver unbind?

Looking at stmp3xxx_wdt_register() called at the end of stmp3xxx_rtc_probe(),
the watchdog child device is manually added with platform_device_add(), but
stmp3xxx_rtc_remove() doesn't appear to call platform_device_unregister()
to clean this up.

If the RTC driver is unbound via sysfs, the parent device's drvdata is
cleared and devm resources are freed. Because the child watchdog device
remains active, could a subsequent access via stmp3xxx_wdt_set_timeout()
dereference the now-NULL parent drvdata and crash the system?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728005303.574936-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28  0:53 [PATCHv2] rtc: stmp3xxx: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() Rosen Penev
2026-07-28  1:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260728010457.ED2581F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox