Linux RTC
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: cmos: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:30:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810053010.B7A721F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810051504.26912-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Propagating -EPROBE_DEFER from platform_get_irq_optional() causes a permanent device probe failure because rtc-cmos is registered using platform_driver_probe(), which explicitly forbids deferred probing.
- [High] Propagating parsing errors like -EINVAL bypasses the x86 legacy IRQ fallback, breaking RTC probing on systems with malformed ACPI tables.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: cmos: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup ---
commit bf54cacd6dce9cc731cd51fdbcbf8b84af0b1e7f
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

rtc: cmos: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup

The commit updates the RTC CMOS driver to propagate error codes returned by
platform_get_irq_optional() other than -ENXIO, while preserving -1 for the
case where no optional IRQ is available.

> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> index fa04ece151b8b..0a2c7383c8cd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> @@ -1436,7 +1436,9 @@ static int __init cmos_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	else
>  		resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> -	if (irq < 0) {
> +	if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> +		return irq;

[Severity: High]
Does propagating -EPROBE_DEFER from platform_get_irq_optional() cause a
permanent device probe failure?

Since rtc-cmos is registered using platform_driver_probe(), which explicitly
forbids deferred probing, returning -EPROBE_DEFER here might cause the driver
core to convert it to -ENXIO and permanently fail the probe instead of
proceeding without an optional IRQ.

[Severity: High]
Does propagating parsing errors like -EINVAL bypass the x86 legacy IRQ
fallback?

On x86 systems with malformed ACPI tables (e.g., specifying IRQ 0, which
platform_get_irq_optional() rejects with -EINVAL), propagating the error
bypasses the fallback logic below that successfully hardcodes the IRQ to
RTC_IRQ if legacy PIC IRQs are supported, potentially breaking RTC probing
on those systems.

> +	if (irq == -ENXIO) {
>  		irq = -1;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>  		/*

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810051504.26912-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10  5:15 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: m48t59: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-10  5:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: cmos: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-10  5:30   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10  5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: m48t59: " sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810053010.B7A721F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox