From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Cong Nguyen" <congnt264@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: stm32: fix clock leak on pinctrl probe failure
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:54:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914135401.373D91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914132914.2371788-1-congnt264@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Routing pinctrl failures to the manual clock cleanup path creates a critical window where devm-managed resources (IRQ, RTC device) remain active while hardware clocks are disabled, risking a synchronous external abort (bus fault).
--
commit 813d70ca28c122c9814bc7903a9c96494f127aea
Author: Cong Nguyen <congnt264@gmail.com>
rtc: stm32: fix clock leak on pinctrl probe failure
This commit addresses a clock leak during pinctrl probe failure. It updates
the error handling paths for devm_pinctrl_register_and_init() and
pinctrl_enable() to route through the existing err label, ensuring rtc_ck
and pclk are unwound properly.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> index d4ebf3eb54aa9..e7a942f6c1906 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1175,12 +1175,16 @@ static int stm32_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> stm32_rtc_clean_outs(rtc);
>
> ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(&pdev->dev, &stm32_rtc_pdesc, rtc, &pctl);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl register failed");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl register failed");
> + goto err;
[Severity: High]
Does this new error path create a window for a synchronous external abort?
When pinctrl initialization fails (for example, returning -EPROBE_DEFER),
this now jumps to the err label where rtc_ck and pclk are manually disabled.
However, the RTC device and the alarm IRQ were registered earlier in the
probe function using devres-managed functions:
stm32_rtc_probe()
rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(...);
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(..., stm32_rtc_alarm_irq, ...);
Because devres resources are not released until after the probe function
returns, there is a window where the clocks are disabled but the IRQ handler
and RTC device remain active.
Could the still-registered IRQ fire during this cleanup window? If that
happens, or if userspace accesses the RTC device, driver callbacks like
stm32_rtc_alarm_irq() might attempt to access hardware registers without
the APB clock enabled, resulting in a bus fault.
> + }
>
> ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl enable failed");
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl enable failed");
> + goto err;
> + }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260914132914.2371788-1-congnt264@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 13:29 [PATCH] rtc: stm32: fix clock leak on pinctrl probe failure Cong Nguyen
2026-09-14 13:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-16 7:49 ` [Linux-stm32] " Antonio Borneo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914135401.373D91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=congnt264@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox