From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B15441021 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 21:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789594538; cv=none; b=RwAkXbj3GbVEwj8CLqFGIuileETTplbSghyRdVoEY09a21v9+IbUwD6kjo1qu8nPJCqYUPNAoYfm2Wgtdw7WxOpW3yz0/5zmYZtDdpKffacG30uOZf0dJwcuWaSWgyAC+Y07Be10TJ29gBiEPiyEiniO3TkV5pCTRMuogFYdD2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789594538; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+6OeeBaWxgKYoigijBpiDk+6Za6u6ZC+dPyxTJRRL/M=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=jF+ZsSi1KYYnfNDCGtUsWm38wYsc2KzeZLSDeotCTVmqoGd+U31XRQgBLyylKQqjvtkCI25BE+To6bLtSE5faYWVJITv4L/1ERw13jIAfW8C1N55djqnmj4KKEUG1D8bWNH8i7VfPluvk/zDCuIIHj5aQMnFjSYH+Fbf4FJR8hE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TX+orwx2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TX+orwx2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56C4B1F000FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 21:35:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789594524; bh=+6OeeBaWxgKYoigijBpiDk+6Za6u6ZC+dPyxTJRRL/M=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=TX+orwx2MoUKbkPqc2E6F6OmFEkydHY+146S24MtuvWeYu+tXNgBBVdThkLSRlzQn 10sd0NS2VQtnOrpIwCaioQ+PSleV7jI8jlcDQ3wUsUg8d7sF4nB2W5aFqkWAlmtfmi mMFw1j9/qpEeSJpoIZ7KbmakEfsR2kl6zCEbLf2eZXBos4+h+hFOUQqcDoHl+G37Si R5pSw1N25NebYeTUiRSxvrXmUFbSUn5yD2RvLI2vEUc80TP6ZoUsG2gZL0eiQEMnVW KZbl9Luaf/bas4NhAN2mC2F1ZGe/l029oZapVC7dQ3x7Avlx0ONE5DFjbUOB6w1fAi 6kO3hvw80UJ2A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: skip properly if setting alarm fails Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Wolfram Sang" Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260916213108.9234-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> References: <20260916213108.9234-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20260916213108.9234-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 21:35:23 +0000 Message-Id: <20260916213524.56C4B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Use the proper framework call to mark a test as skipped. Currently, the > test is considered good, only the printout mentions the skip. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916213108.9234= -5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com?part=3D3