From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: TAD: Split three functions to untangle runtime PM handling
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 21:24:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23076728.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2366642.iZASKD2KPV@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Move the core functionality of acpi_tad_get_real_time(),
acpi_tad_wake_set(), and acpi_tad_wake_read() into separate functions
called __acpi_tad_get_real_time(), __acpi_tad_wake_set(), and
__acpi_tad_wake_read(), respectively, which can be called from
code blocks following a single runtime resume of the device.
This will facilitate adding alarm support to the RTC class device
interface of the driver going forward.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
@@ -151,14 +151,10 @@ out_free:
return ret;
}
-static int acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct device *dev, struct acpi_tad_rt *rt)
+static int __acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct device *dev, struct acpi_tad_rt *rt)
{
int ret;
- PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
- if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
- return -ENXIO;
-
ret = acpi_tad_evaluate_grt(dev, rt);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -169,6 +165,15 @@ static int acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct
return 0;
}
+static int acpi_tad_get_real_time(struct device *dev, struct acpi_tad_rt *rt)
+{
+ PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+ if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ return __acpi_tad_get_real_time(dev, rt);
+}
+
/* sysfs interface */
static char *acpi_tad_rt_next_field(char *s, int *val)
@@ -268,8 +273,8 @@ static ssize_t time_show(struct device *
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(time);
-static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct device *dev, char *method, u32 timer_id,
- u32 value)
+static int __acpi_tad_wake_set(struct device *dev, char *method, u32 timer_id,
+ u32 value)
{
acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
union acpi_object args[] = {
@@ -286,10 +291,6 @@ static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct devi
args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
args[1].integer.value = value;
- PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
- if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
- return -ENXIO;
-
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || retval)
return -EIO;
@@ -297,6 +298,16 @@ static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct devi
return 0;
}
+static int acpi_tad_wake_set(struct device *dev, char *method, u32 timer_id,
+ u32 value)
+{
+ PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
+ if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ return __acpi_tad_wake_set(dev, method, timer_id, value);
+}
+
static int acpi_tad_wake_write(struct device *dev, const char *buf, char *method,
u32 timer_id, const char *specval)
{
@@ -317,8 +328,8 @@ static int acpi_tad_wake_write(struct de
return acpi_tad_wake_set(dev, method, timer_id, value);
}
-static ssize_t acpi_tad_wake_read(struct device *dev, char *buf, char *method,
- u32 timer_id, const char *specval)
+static int __acpi_tad_wake_read(struct device *dev, char *method, u32 timer_id,
+ unsigned long long *retval)
{
acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
union acpi_object args[] = {
@@ -328,18 +339,30 @@ static ssize_t acpi_tad_wake_read(struct
.pointer = args,
.count = ARRAY_SIZE(args),
};
- unsigned long long retval;
acpi_status status;
args[0].integer.value = timer_id;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, retval);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static ssize_t acpi_tad_wake_read(struct device *dev, char *buf, char *method,
+ u32 timer_id, const char *specval)
+{
+ unsigned long long retval;
+ int ret;
+
PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE(dev, pm);
if (PM_RUNTIME_ACQUIRE_ERR(&pm))
return -ENXIO;
- status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, method, &arg_list, &retval);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return -EIO;
+ ret = __acpi_tad_wake_read(dev, method, timer_id, &retval);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
if ((u32)retval == ACPI_TAD_WAKE_DISABLED)
return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", specval);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 19:23 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: TAD: Add alarm support to RTC class device interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-31 19:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-03-31 19:25 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: TAD: Relocate two functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-31 19:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: TAD: Split acpi_tad_rtc_set_time() Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-31 19:38 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: TAD: Add alarm support to the RTC class device interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-04-03 15:34 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: TAD: Add alarm support to " Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23076728.EfDdHjke4D@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox