From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([212.103.203.10]:50698 "EHLO mail.micronovasrl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731109AbeGTNy0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:54:26 -0400 Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com (mail.micronovasrl.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.micronovasrl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4153CB008F0 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.micronovasrl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.micronovasrl.com (mail.micronovasrl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WYzJ8_Fwe4D2 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] rtc: ds1307: add frequency_test_enable sysfs attribute to check tick on m41txx To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Alessandro Zummo , "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" , open list References: <20180718094006.105675-1-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <20180718094006.105675-3-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <30d6b568-b785-ae93-9f56-d0a8b7e82901@micronovasrl.com> From: Giulio Benetti Message-ID: <27a1d79b-7651-4896-58f7-73ff73b14c22@micronovasrl.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:06:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 20/07/2018 14:53, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Giulio Benetti > wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> Il 18/07/2018 18:26, Andy Shevchenko ha scritto: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Giulio Benetti >>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> + int ret; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + ret = kstrtobool(buf, &freq_test_en); >>>>>> + if (ret == -EINVAL) { >>> >>> >>>>> What kind of other error code you may expect and why they are not >>>>> considered as no error? >>> >>> >>>> According to documentation, kstrtobool can only fail with -EINVAL. >>>> See: >>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.18-rc5/source/lib/kstrtox.c#L332 >>> >>> >>> That's correct. So, what do you want to show by explicitly mentioned >>> an error code in the condition? >>> >> >> So you mean I should check for negative values instead of specific error, >> right? > > Learn from the existing code. > > As you found kstrtobool() returns either 0 (no error), or -EINVAL (the > only possible error code for now). > Checking ret for non-zero is enough. > Thus, > > if (ret) { > ... > return ret; > } > > should do a job. > Oh, I was pretty sure I've found an example of kstrtobool() in the way I've used, instead no. Thanks for pointing me. I correct it. Best regards Giulio