Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Update the Icicle Kit device tree

[Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie>]

On 04/02/2022 18:09, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 03:47:15 PST (-0800), conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>
>> This series updates the Microchip Icicle Kit device tree by adding a
>> host of peripherals, and some updates to the memory map. In addition,
>> the device tree has been split into a third part, which contains "soft"
>> peripherals that are in the fpga fabric.
>>
>> Several of the entries are for peripherals that have not get had their
>> drivers upstreamed, so in those cases the dt bindings are included where
>> appropriate in order to avoid the many "DT compatible string <x> appears
>> un-documented" errors.
>>
>> Depends on mpfs clock driver binding (on clk/next) to provide
>> dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
>> and on the other changes to the icicle/mpfs device tree from geert
>> that are already in linux/riscv/for-next.
>>
>> Additionally, the interrupt-extended warnings on the plic/clint are
>> cleared by [1] & [2].
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1639744468.git.geert@linux-m68k.org/ 
>>
>> [2] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1639744106.git.geert@linux-m68k.org/ 
>>
>>
<snip>
> 
> Looks like Rob still has some feedback that still needs to be addressed. 

Still not passing Rob's bot as it depends on a binding in clk-next & I 
also need to reword the descriptions in the PWM binding.

> I'm happy to take these via the RISC-V tree when the bindings are set 

Great

> (assuming the DTs match whatever gets agreed upons), but also fine if 
> someone else wants to take it > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> Either way, I'm going to drop this (and the v4, which was at the top of 
> my inbox) as it looks like there'll be at least a v6.
Yup, hopefully v6 on Monday

Thanks,
Conor.