From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <5369E8C6.1070409@atmel.com> Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:03:18 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Belloni , Bryan Evenson , Boris BREZILLON CC: Alessandro Zummo , "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Andrew Victor , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq References: <94c06375c1b44c8eb5233b0ccf2e4b13@BY2PR05MB048.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <1399386481-18643-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20140506211040.GF11243@piout.net> In-Reply-To: <20140506211040.GF11243@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" List-ID: On 06/05/2014 23:10, Alexandre Belloni : > Hi, > > On 06/05/2014 at 19:06:56 +0000, Bryan Evenson wrote : >> >> I'd assume this patch would be backported to the longterm releases? >> > > If by longterm, you mean the linux4sam tree, 3.10 branch, it is up to > Nicolas to take it. I believe it will be pretty easy to convince him ;) Absolutely, it is always easy to convince me with: - good commit message - script to reproduce the issue - follow-up of the patch plus testing - dialogue between skilled kernel developers So, yes, I will "ack" the patch and immediately integrate it in our linux4sam 3.10 branch. On the other hand, I let Boris add the "stable" tag to his original patch. Thanks to all of you for this fix. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre