From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh3si3270186pbc.0.2015.06.25.00.46.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ev16so45079584pad.0 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <558BB1C1.2090400@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:16:09 +0530 From: Vaibhav Hiremath MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Belloni CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Xie Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH-v2] rtc: 88pm80x: add device tree support References: <1434567488-6477-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1434567488-6477-3-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150620004354.GY27492@piout.net> In-Reply-To: <20150620004354.GY27492@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , On Saturday 20 June 2015 06:13 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > Sorry I missed this email. Just wanted to send reminder email and saw this :) > On 18/06/2015 at 00:28:06 +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote : >> - pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); >> - if (pdata == NULL) >> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No platform data!\n"); >> + if (!pdata && !node) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >> + "pm80x-rtc requires platform data or of_node\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + if (!pdata) { >> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); > > I had troubles to follow the rtc_wakeup initialization cleanup but it > seems OK. Probably, once we have complete PM support ready then it would be easier to understand. I think as of now lets have this minimal code for rtc_wakeup. > However, I'm wondering why you are adding DT support as this > will always be probed from the MFD driver which pass the platform_data > and avoids that allocation. > You are right. Originally, it was cleanup patch, - remove pm80x_pdata - Add check for pdata and np - and around rtc_wakeup While doing that I added this nice to have allocation. Thanks, Vaibhav -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.