From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rtc-linux+bncBD2OLRXW4ABBBOUO4O2QKGQEXC4L6OY@googlegroups.com>
Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com (hqemgate15.nvidia.com. [216.228.121.64])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff2si1726234pad.2.2016.02.08.08.50.02
        for <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <56B8C484.7000309@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:08:28 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: <lee.jones@linaro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	<k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	<cw00.choi@samsung.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V4 1/6] regmap: irq: add apis to unmap the
 mapped irq
References: <1454769447-785-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1454769447-785-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20160208145550.GE7265@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20160208145550.GE7265@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <rtc-linux.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/post>, <mailto:rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <https://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:rtc-linux+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <https://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux
Sender: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <https://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/subscribe>, <mailto:rtc-linux+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+712029733259+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <https://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/subscribe>


On Monday 08 February 2016 08:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:07:22PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> Before removing irq domains, it is require to unmap all
>> mapped interrupt from that domain. Currently there is API
>> to map the interrupt on chip as regmap_irq_get_virq() for
>> creating mapping. Add equivalent API to dispose the mapped
>> irq in irq domains.
> This makes no sense to me.  Why would you ever want to unmap the
> interrupts separately to destroying the domain

This is the requirement from irq_domain_remove(). This is what we have 
in irq_domain_remove():
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c

/*
  * This routine is used to remove an irq domain. The caller must ensure
  * that all mappings within the domain have been disposed of prior to
  * use, depending on the revmap type.
  */
void irq_domain_remove(struct irq_domain *domain)


I am adding the API equivalent to regmap_irq_get_virq() to unmap virtual 
irq here.



> and why would you ever
> want to destroy the domain without unmapping the interrupts?
>
That's exactlly we are trying to do, unmap interrupt in client level 
before destroying domain.





-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.