From: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@norik.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, upstream@phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rv3028: Improve trickle charger logic
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:35:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73bc2f5c-bdae-e57f-73ab-db5e453e0c7f@norik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230608093155cedff41a@mail.local>
Hi Alexandre,
On 8. 06. 23 11:31, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/06/2023 11:04:46+0200, Andrej Picej wrote:
>> + ret = regmap_read(rv3028->regmap, RV3028_BACKUP, &val_old);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* mask out only trickle charger bits */
>> + val_old = val_old & (RV3028_BACKUP_TCE | RV3028_BACKUP_TCR_MASK);
>> +
>> /* setup trickle charger */
>> - if (!device_property_read_u32(&client->dev, "trickle-resistor-ohms",
>> - &ohms)) {
>> + if (device_property_read_u32(&client->dev, "trickle-resistor-ohms", &ohms)) {
>> + /* disable the trickle charger */
>> + val = 0;
>
> You can't do that, this will break existing users that may set the
> trickle charger from their bootloader for example.
hmm...ok I understand that idea. I thought that might be a problem. I
guess keeping default as it is has a higher priority.
What do you say if setting this property to 0 (or maybe -1) disabled the
trickle charger?
So if users add:
trickle-resistor-ohms = <0>;
or
trickle-resistor-ohms = <(-1)>;
this would mean disable the trickle charger?
I know it is far from optimal, but this would solve both things:
* not braking existing implementation,
* users could disable the trickle charger.
What do you say.
Thanks for your review.
Best regards,
Andrej
>
>> + } else {
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rv3028_trickle_resistors); i++)
>> @@ -947,15 +957,21 @@ static int rv3028_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> break;
>>
>> if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(rv3028_trickle_resistors)) {
>> - ret = rv3028_update_cfg(rv3028, RV3028_BACKUP, RV3028_BACKUP_TCE |
>> - RV3028_BACKUP_TCR_MASK, RV3028_BACKUP_TCE | i);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + /* enable the trickle charger and setup its resistor accordingly */
>> + val = RV3028_BACKUP_TCE | i;
>> } else {
>> dev_warn(&client->dev, "invalid trickle resistor value\n");
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + /* only update EEPROM if changes are necessary */
>> + if (val_old != val) {
>> + ret = rv3028_update_cfg(rv3028, RV3028_BACKUP, RV3028_BACKUP_TCE |
>> + RV3028_BACKUP_TCR_MASK, val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = rtc_add_group(rv3028->rtc, &rv3028_attr_group);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-08 9:04 [PATCH] rtc: rv3028: Improve trickle charger logic Andrej Picej
2023-06-08 9:31 ` Alexandre Belloni
2023-06-08 10:35 ` Andrej Picej [this message]
2023-06-15 6:06 ` Andrej Picej
2023-06-08 14:48 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73bc2f5c-bdae-e57f-73ab-db5e453e0c7f@norik.com \
--to=andrej.picej@norik.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=upstream@phytec.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox