From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw2.prolan.hu (fw2.prolan.hu [193.68.50.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1E714AD35; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719565118; cv=none; b=qvXzPi1ix4Awg9ir72FB845A/pGPEuRkVRpoeALPpsebI1PDdNllBKvfvuA6aLy0qZtLqP4k93+xif2n/+FEk2MeNPvLv2Fc7QjJukHdQxMwFr/cNsfN1S0/NQBDxkh7UJPS9hsK//OVOf+TNiWeU8JFbya89POcIT7sDgsMfoo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719565118; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PWL6hEvqmZKsuBznvNlNI6WklKd2ODvQV6+yRxLHbIY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=O3VjKRrX9VkmhHmwRa/eg723OTZg0Bi+pobzxoj2piNHd2u5sLDM+QBrkfpqxDOgFEVCbGSP3+9TgGLdiSsujCZBW20HpJTH+6rCUJugs69vJrMt4Ftx+hpKMNi9rYCqOW2Nv8jSyeGJFHOheleeUGpGLvCa50e2hit6HRwbpIg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b=Q8CFy1US; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.68.50.107 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prolan.hu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=prolan.hu header.i=@prolan.hu header.b="Q8CFy1US" Received: from proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-mailgw.intranet.prolan.hu (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 308FEA0608; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:58:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prolan.hu; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mail; bh=DgXaLxXe1xWsWcx5Us3s /TGr8c82QL8Uqd0FFIZe7oY=; b=Q8CFy1USBcGokTohSzsQs3WnV//gszXH6ymY E9FQe610W6zZa1CAjPyXNFz3cs5lEn4tOiLo5xBpcVVd9XPrmnl+muzhzH6vxY9z dmtQjfAT+T7ywDIJwz0zFF9dj2wRMHePMPn2aQT266nSr9xO8wTddU4UOdAOCP68 epxJEmWcpmD7lNSYBPryG6PPnFJ/5HqcaAMr+nzOUHF5iBgLAkuEdyKdxLGcY69N Kczmjevk+IHxregefwyKo/ekUCsK1WFo2PLTr7ZAZYsQ8qbOx6DKSbmdOm4kCskG wuH8vlMMv3UKf5E/mF7Xmy49eSzTD+0/oUyuvLxMHkdKWHv2PYfSNj7UM8XYTtLG zZ6DqXdnepr4CQghdnM+/LPy5ZqscmWpuSbXWfOQqJxsJPxY3DsprsuPWlL18Hp6 1kdGDqIOjf1e3P0RgXdl/EVtBzMyDAzCJY1d4Wt2zQk9SiZLAP91zS5X1UP1I8id SbeJPNfFqDUSAdmd7Xonh1Z0rDLKgyzTpeUFCELXZTU9NdlgU9hF7o1SQtHvYfqe x17JUDxp7rnMaPDb+i/NI+RjDRNTcmVV4t+8TBdUUNroDkFEFCo8wrrHmcZ56Lh6 qqb7JKWcCM8SRobBaHhEmEklneXT3dwOVDDbg3lO4SliirsvItQEiq/W7LxgIVB5 jVIw82g= Message-ID: <83e2d171-86b0-4d51-8481-dc5b482b97a3@prolan.hu> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:58:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH resubmit] rtc: ds1307: Detect oscillator fail on mcp794xx To: Alexandre Belloni CC: , , =?UTF-8?Q?Szentendrei=2C_Tam=C3=A1s?= References: <20240621080512.2916664-1-csokas.bence@prolan.hu> <202406272237033260538e@mail.local> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?B?Q3PDs2vDoXMgQmVuY2U=?= In-Reply-To: <202406272237033260538e@mail.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: ATLAS.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.229) To ATLAS.intranet.prolan.hu (10.254.0.229) X-EsetResult: clean, is OK X-EsetId: 37303A2945A129576C7D63 Hi! On 6/28/24 00:37, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hello, > > It is not clear to me why your resent this one but not the other one, > can you elaborate? It was kind of an unrelated patch, I'll send it after I get this one merged. But so far, there hasn't been any movements on this series at all. > On 21/06/2024 10:05:13+0200, Csókás, Bence wrote: >> This patch enables the detection of the oscillator failure >> on mcp794xx chips. >> >> Co-developed-by: Szentendrei, Tamás >> Signed-off-by: Szentendrei, Tamás >> Signed-off-by: Csókás, Bence The "other one", I assume, refers to this: On 6/11/24 09:24, Csókás, Bence wrote: > `tm_year` may go up to 299 if the device supports the > century bit. Therefore, subtracting may not give us > a valid 2-digit number, but modulo does. > > Co-developed-by: Szentendrei, Tamás > Signed-off-by: Szentendrei, Tamás > Signed-off-by: Csókás, Bence And the only thing they had in common is that they were in the same file, which my colleague, Tamás, put into one commit in our tree, that I split for upstreaming purposes. But really, they are not really related or interdependent on one another. Bence