From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 09:39:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz80v0hf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b7dedfc-b97d-4ff8-86af-8c92b3fb37cf@o2.pl>
On Fri, Apr 04 2025 at 01:46, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
> W dniu 3.04.2025 o 15:12, Thomas Gleixner pisze:
>> Converting it to a raw lock "fixes" the problem, but RT people will hunt
>> you down with a big latency bat.
>>
>> But this is not related to the commit above and not new.
>>
>> timekeeping_suspend() has always invoked mach_get_cmos_time() with the
>> freeze lock held and mc146818_get_time() has always locked rtc_lock.
>>
>> I wonder, why this splat hasn't popped before. On RT lockdep should have
>> complained forever. Sebastian???
>
> I was able to trigger the bug on Linux 6.1.0 with
> CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING enabled and I suspect it can be
> triggered much earlier.
>
> It is likely that only after
>
> commit 560af5dc839eef ("lockdep: Enable PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING with PROVE_LOCKING.")
>
> people are seeing this simply because no one previously did
> the test with CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y.
Well. On RT enabled kernels the raw lock nesting was always enabled. So
I just was curious why this didn't show up earlier. Though RT folks
might not regularly test suspend :)
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-30 11:32 [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Borislav Petkov
2025-03-30 12:23 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-03-30 12:32 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-03 13:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-03 13:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 19:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-04 6:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 13:34 ` [PATCH] timekeeping: Add a lockdep override in tick_freeze() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 18:47 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-09 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-31 18:27 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-05-31 19:16 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-02 19:52 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 20:20 ` [DRAFT PATCH] rtc-cmos: use spin_lock_irqsave in cmos_interrupt Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 21:19 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-03 6:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 23:46 ` [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-04 7:39 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jz80v0hf.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chris.bainbridge@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox