From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-07.mail-europe.com (mail-0701.mail-europe.com [51.83.17.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B8F50094A for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 12:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.83.17.38 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767963286; cv=none; b=Uy+QuO8gAP9WFdb/O1snZeUxaeEDGlh3u7hdoTbovpYahYCdC4eTUnmmtTU8Vj8vQct+WdAUT0BQBGRXYRBPocUUxdSFU7p+KO0+xcYcxXbqgUl6Pm3W48TZH/E0zVjNVFKgJtGXtMrh35LSuj96+ztsxM6+DB4FNWdu28Yn9OI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767963286; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3P6N9VFu+Ns23kDG3VeKvtOIn9dAHn55AaRPFk8Nd2w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AVCjbrZrbx0f8cRwUq8/m8N9RJjYyOSq5zll8jVoDzmFUkgYkotedSxj/Cq9N2OHrpgMif87bnC3utp9DT7951WT9g/qq0fSFo1e7KhF+4ENnhlg2F4erk14HOpBeRtwkE9VmrgMDzTMvlhHHizXgbUnR+EQSnmVlt+1OKDhXjc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b=mUO1cokS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.83.17.38 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b="mUO1cokS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=geanix.com; s=protonmail2; t=1767963268; x=1768222468; bh=3P6N9VFu+Ns23kDG3VeKvtOIn9dAHn55AaRPFk8Nd2w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To: Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=mUO1cokS4hogWoSrjn6OXrzhTJeBEJGv6ZJl/MzXAlop9bo6/0xn7J5APRetAdayr mZdW2Sl+6gCl+4/zfNMxfo7beOFo41MU8rAnQBBgR6boHrmBUOfs4BlxNYoHtR+Cc9 ABZUoPIIqdluIrMd5/s05K9kyXMAxPSME9COnZXAepBlbozyvrBeh6ZGcz/qFhnbmu rLCCPWkiSH6fA1+SytM2uCgrL1NSS4DC41SMk+/43jfyDPgskJN8NMhzW+lQM4eOX6 5kPYJxLUi+0xKMa0labeu4ZrdpCdzBptLdE653jbYgrTPie28lY+WwmU/Sgfs+ofPv MIbjRhr9SE1Qg== X-Pm-Submission-Id: 4dnhYb21Lsz1DHSC From: Esben Haabendal To: "Thorsten Leemhuis" Cc: "alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" , "Nick Bowler" , "Anthony Pighin (Nokia)" , "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" , "Linux kernel regressions list" Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: interface: Alarm race handling should not discard preceding error In-Reply-To: <45d14eb4-9495-4aa8-9382-8d756c0ae39e@leemhuis.info> (Thorsten Leemhuis's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:18:29 +0100") References: <80e7450d-d842-49ca-8219-a995c8ce8bfe@leemhuis.info> <45d14eb4-9495-4aa8-9382-8d756c0ae39e@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 13:54:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87o6n3c5fh.fsf@geanix.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Thorsten Leemhuis" writes: > On 12/16/25 16:09, Nick Bowler wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:51:30AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> Lo! FWIW, Nick Bowler (now CCed) reported that below patch fixes a >>> regression for him caused by the commit from Esben (now also CCed) the >>> Fixes: tag mentions. See "hwclock busted w/ M48T59 RTC (regression)" for >>> details: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2t6bhs4udbu55ctbemkhlluchz2exrwown7kmu2gss6zukaxdm@ughygemahmem/ >>> and >>> >>> Nick, could you maybe provide a tested-by tag here? Maybe that would >>> motivate someone to get this en route to mainline. >>> >>> Adding a "Cc: " would be great, too, as Nick >>> encountered this on earlier series, as it was backported all the way to >>> 5.15.y >> >> It was backported to 5.10.y and 5.4.y too, but only after I had reported >> this regression back in October (and I guess 5.4.y is EOL now). >> >> Tested-by: Nick Bowler > > Esben (author of the culprit) and Alexandre (who merged it): do you > still have reviewing/applying the patch at the start of this thread ( > https://lore.kernel.org/all/BN0PR08MB6951415A751F236375A2945683D1A@BN0PR08MB6951.namprd08.prod.outlook.com/#t) > on your todo list? > > Sorry for nagging, would just be good to finally get this 6.18-rc1 > regression fixed in mainline so the fix can be backported to stable, > too. And due to the holidays I thought a quick reminder might be wise. > > Or was this fixed somehow and I just missed it? Sorry for introducing this error. The fix looks good to me. I have added my Reviewed-by to it. Am I correct in that it also fixes the problem reported by Nick Bowler? /Esben