From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:12:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sempv17b.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250330113202.GAZ-krsjAnurOlTcp-@fat_crate.local>
On Sun, Mar 30 2025 at 13:32, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> while playing with suspend to RAM, I got this lockdep splat below.
>
> Poking around I found:
>
> ec5895c0f2d8 ("rtc: mc146818-lib: extract mc146818_avoid_UIP")
>
> which is doing this funky taking and dropping the rtc_lock and I guess that's
> inherited from ye olde times.
>
> I "fixed" it so lockdeup doesn't warn by converting rtc_lock to a raw spinlock
> but this is definitely not the right fix so let me bounce it off to the folks
> on Cc who might have a better idea perhaps...
Converting it to a raw lock "fixes" the problem, but RT people will hunt
you down with a big latency bat.
But this is not related to the commit above and not new.
timekeeping_suspend() has always invoked mach_get_cmos_time() with the
freeze lock held and mc146818_get_time() has always locked rtc_lock.
I wonder, why this splat hasn't popped before. On RT lockdep should have
complained forever. Sebastian???
Suspend, whether it's suspend to idle or regular suspend, are weird
contexts as there is no concurrency possible because interrupts are
disabled and it is guaranteed that there is only a single CPU which is
operational. The other CPUs are either in a deep idle state or when they
are on the way back, they serialize on tick_freeze_lock.
So taking the non-raw spinlock in that context is safe, but obviously
lockdep does not know about that.
Peter, any ideas?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-30 11:32 [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Borislav Petkov
2025-03-30 12:23 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-03-30 12:32 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-03 13:12 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-04-03 13:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 19:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-04 6:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 13:34 ` [PATCH] timekeeping: Add a lockdep override in tick_freeze() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 18:47 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-09 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-31 18:27 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-05-31 19:16 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-02 19:52 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 20:20 ` [DRAFT PATCH] rtc-cmos: use spin_lock_irqsave in cmos_interrupt Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 21:19 ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-03 6:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 23:46 ` [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-04 7:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sempv17b.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).