From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] rtc: cmos: Enable ACPI alarm if advertised in ACPI FADT
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 13:11:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9618535.CDJkKcVGEf@rafael.j.wysocki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3964452.kQq0lBPeGt@rafael.j.wysocki>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If the ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC flag is unset, the platform is declaring that
it supports the ACPI RTC fixed event which should be used instead of a
dedicated CMOS RTC IRQ. However, the driver only enables it when
is_hpet_enabled() returns true, which is questionable because there is
no clear connection between enabled HPET and signaling wakeup via the
ACPI RTC fixed event (for instance, the latter can be expected to work
on systems that don't include a functional HPET).
Moreover, since use_hpet_alarm() returns false if use_acpi_alarm is set,
the ACPI RTC fixed event is effectively used instead of the HPET alarm
if the latter is functional, but there is no particular reason why it
could not be used otherwise.
Accordingly, on x86 systems with ACPI, set use_acpi_alarm if
ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC is unset without looking at whether or not HPET is
enabled.
Also, do the ACPI FADT check in use_acpi_alarm_quirks() before the DMI
BIOS year checks which are more expensive and it's better to skip them
if ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC is set.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -817,6 +817,9 @@ static void rtc_wake_off(struct device *
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
{
+ if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_FIXED_RTC)
+ return;
+
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
if (dmi_get_bios_year() < 2015)
@@ -830,8 +833,6 @@ static void use_acpi_alarm_quirks(void)
default:
return;
}
- if (!is_hpet_enabled())
- return;
use_acpi_alarm = true;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-14 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-14 12:09 [PATCH v1 0/2] rtc: cmos: Do not require IRQ if ACPI alarm is used Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-14 12:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2026-03-20 18:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] rtc: cmos: Enable ACPI alarm if advertised in ACPI FADT Alexandre Belloni
2026-03-20 19:26 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2026-03-14 12:12 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] rtc: cmos: Do not require IRQ if ACPI alarm is used Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-03-20 18:00 ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-03-20 19:27 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2026-03-20 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9618535.CDJkKcVGEf@rafael.j.wysocki \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox