linux-rtc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giorgi Tchankvetadze <giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	 Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,  linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  sirius.wang@mediatek.com,
	vince-wl.liu@mediatek.com, jh.hsu@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: mt6397: Add new bit definitions for RTC_BBPU register
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:21:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAE7dp2rxfgj6FKoM-kesX8632t3AA7Lk5rC-uasyQUS2hQuUfQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b41749ae-640b-4911-976f-8aa36d40ed6b@kernel.org>

Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
    linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
    linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Shunxi,

Can you confirm whether `RTC_BBPU_PWREN` (bit 0),
`RTC_BBPU_CLR` (bit 1) and `RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL` (bit 3) are documented
in the MT6397 datasheet (please cite section/page)? They look like
standard RTC controls (power enable, clear/reset, alarm reset) and
might be useful to include, but I agree with Krzysztof that adding
definitions with no users can accumulate technical debt.

Suggestion: either
- add the definitions when a driver actually needs them, or
- keep them now but add a short rationale in the commit message
  (datasheet reference + intended use) so future reviewers understand
  why they exist.

Also: please split cosmetic whitespace fixes (RTC_BBPU_KEY) into a
separate patch to make review/merge easier.

Thanks for the patch; I’m following the thread.

— Giorgi


On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:03 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2025 10:15, ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Shunxi Zhang <ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > This patch adds new bit definitions for the RTC_BBPU register in the
>
> Why? There is no user of these. Don't add useless defines.
>
> > mt6397 RTC header file. The following bit definitions are introduced:
>
> Hm?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shunxi Zhang <ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > index 27883af44f87..001cef6b7302 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> > @@ -15,8 +15,11 @@
> >  #include <linux/rtc.h>
> >
> >  #define RTC_BBPU               0x0000
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_PWREN         BIT(0)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_CLR           BIT(1)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_RESET_AL      BIT(3)
> >  #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY         BIT(6)
> > -#define RTC_BBPU_KEY            (0x43 << 8)
> > +#define RTC_BBPU_KEY           (0x43 << 8)
>
>
> Why?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-11 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11  8:15 [PATCH v1 0/2] rtc: Enhance RTC driver with BBPU bit definitions and shutdown handling ot_shunxi.zhang
2025-08-11  8:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: mt6397: Add new bit definitions for RTC_BBPU register ot_shunxi.zhang
2025-08-11 11:02   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-11 11:21     ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze [this message]
2025-08-19  7:53       ` Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜)
2025-08-19  7:54     ` Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜)
2025-08-19  8:16       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-19  8:32         ` Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜)
2025-08-11  8:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] rtc: mt6397: Add BBPU alarm status reset and shutdown handling ot_shunxi.zhang
2025-08-11 13:09   ` Alexandre Belloni
2025-08-19  7:48     ` Shunxi Zhang (章顺喜)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAE7dp2rxfgj6FKoM-kesX8632t3AA7Lk5rC-uasyQUS2hQuUfQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=giorgitchankvetadze1997@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jh.hsu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ot_shunxi.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sirius.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=vince-wl.liu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).