From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
tcharding <me@tobin.cc>, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: Move rand_initialize() earlier
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:42:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3N6txZf8tzTdLvLwByrsWQvN_JSabV2TGe+zZenMWWxg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181011225421.GA21093@beast>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:54 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Right now rand_initialize() is run as an early_initcall(), but it only
> depends on timekeeping_init() (for mixing ktime_get_real() into the
> pools). However, the call to boot_init_stack_canary() for stack canary
> initialization runs earlier, which triggers a warning at boot:
>
> random: get_random_bytes called from start_kernel+0x357/0x548 with crng_init=0
>
> Instead, this moves rand_initialize() to after timekeeping_init(), and moves
> canary initialization here as well.
>
> Note that this warning may still remain for machines that do not have
> UEFI RNG support (which initializes the RNG pools during setup_arch()),
> or for x86 machines without RDRAND (or booting without "random.trust=on"
> or CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU=y).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Alternatively, ktime_get_real() could get mixed into the pools after
> timekeeping_init(), and rand_initialize() could be run MUCH early,
> like after setup_arch()...
I wonder if mixing in ktime_get_real() is flawed to start with:
This depends on read_persistent_clock64() actually returning
a meaningful time, but in many cases it does not; x86 being
a notable exception.
We have three ways of setting the initial time:
* At early boot using read_persistent_clock64(). This may read
the time from the hypervisor (if any), and on some older
architectures that have a custom RTC abstraction, it
reads from the RTC directly. We generally move away from
the RTC method in favor of the proper rtc class interfaces
(see below)
* At late_initcall time, in rtc_hctosys(). If an RTC driver has
been loaded successfully at this time, it will be read from
there. We also move away from this.
* From user space, which reads the RTC time or NTP,
and then sets the system time from that.
The latter two end up in do_settimeofday64(), but there
is no mixing in of the time into the random seed that I can
see, and it's not clear whether there should be (it
can be called with arbitrary times from user space,
provided CAP_SYS_TIME permissions).
Arnd
next parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-12 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20181011225421.GA21093@beast>
2018-10-12 8:42 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-10-12 14:43 ` [PATCH] random: Move rand_initialize() earlier Theodore Y. Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK8P3a3N6txZf8tzTdLvLwByrsWQvN_JSabV2TGe+zZenMWWxg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).