From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813CC43381 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32EB20883 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726473AbfDAMm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:42:27 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f68.google.com ([209.85.217.68]:34592 "EHLO mail-vs1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725897AbfDAMm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:42:27 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f68.google.com with SMTP id t78so5400930vsc.1; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gZaABUbe2GaXrA4anWl3B0XqHYwuzcQC9FQUs2sqt0k=; b=YR949cZ+wr+HBj6TTCkuNNjbiruJhQM5G3GnbvIhjTwUN3Vd6LUU3hDvWC5jp01vvm DhMtfK7VVsqicUM6FQYwPTh4yk4sxv0rWx/sn8w5VHFNoPOqKs4ddz3D7XWao24H3mB3 Jn1/v0XQluWG5vMzUtxg2oO8pVyz//XJEpLQhSZkXUbVgjNmvscJvD0IHoxOGzNalEx4 4kEuPyE4DB+X9QAwgizHoPzGnWNqYacVRi62avHkJfc8abLHL8LfUbGRjhBIC1xN1bgH n4pz3rMrwj6tbYkniUDjTA0r+dWjY14p9+8vBqiibmbf5mEkNyXIELLWpuHavCaYpQ5t o9Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXwi40O/3onWhdDra/1vuHijHQYniYVUlJ9pnB1NQYoG/8Ggk1d oshAJS38/EnlExJGodtWOpA3iXynApjvH7iVn40= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxwJ7/HA7DSdM9bycDAvNLlAoNAn3jJi01q3MxB2XB0uGSye346l6xogXg5INC6YQIogkxWOm7TlK/xlYnMas= X-Received: by 2002:a67:ba03:: with SMTP id l3mr29321605vsn.96.1554122546118; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190321101557.26857-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <20190401084143.uqbiktkt2vltgrxa@ninjato> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range To: Steve Twiss Cc: Wolfram Sang , Alexandre Belloni , "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Wolfram Sang , Support Opensource , Linux-Renesas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Hi Steve, On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss wrote: > On 01 April 2019 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > The DA9062 and DA9063 have a year register that can go up to 0x3F. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > > > I couldn't test the upper limit (DA9063 hooked to a 32bit system here), > > > but lower limit works and RTC in general works. > > > > BTW, does the RTC alarm interrupt work for you? > > As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions. > > I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the > alarms, I see everything working okay WITHOUT Alexandre's patches ... Thanks! I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds