public inbox for linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Ke Sun" <sunke@kylinos.cn>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alvin Sun" <sk.alvin.x@gmail.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] rtc: add device selector for rtc_class_ops callbacks
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 15:32:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DFSN0O9RRVD6.1LCI38JKGO1R0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260116162203.296844-2-sunke@kylinos.cn>

On Fri Jan 16, 2026 at 5:21 PM CET, Ke Sun wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/dev.c b/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> index baf1a8ca8b2b1..eddcc5a69db3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/dev.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static long rtc_dev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>  		}
>  		default:
>  			if (rtc->ops->param_get)
> -				err = rtc->ops->param_get(rtc->dev.parent, &param);
> +				err = rtc->ops->param_get(rtc_ops_dev(rtc), &param);
>  			else
>  				err = -EINVAL;
>  		}

<snip>

> +/**
> + * rtc_ops_dev - Get the device pointer for RTC ops callbacks
> + * @rtc: RTC device
> + *
> + * Returns &rtc->dev if RTC_OPS_USE_RTC_DEV flag is set,
> + * otherwise returns rtc->dev.parent.
> + */
> +static inline struct device *rtc_ops_dev(struct rtc_device *rtc)
> +{
> +	if (test_bit(RTC_OPS_USE_RTC_DEV, &rtc->flags))
> +		return &rtc->dev;
> +	return rtc->dev.parent;
> +}

I understand that the idea is to gradually convert all drivers to use the RTC
device, rather than it's parent device in RTC device callbacks.

My main concern is that once that has been achieved it's still not what we want
to have eventually, i.e. RTC device callbacks should ideally take a struct
rtc_device as argument and not the embedded base struct device.

I.e. we'd kick off a conversion process that won't reach the actual desired
state.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-19 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-16 16:21 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] rust: Add RTC driver support Ke Sun
2026-01-16 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] rtc: add device selector for rtc_class_ops callbacks Ke Sun
2026-01-16 16:24   ` Ke Sun
2026-01-19 14:32   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-01-20  8:01     ` Ke Sun
2026-02-20 22:53       ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-21  9:31         ` Alvin Sun
2026-02-21 11:16           ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-21 11:19             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-21 14:33               ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-22  0:05                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-22 12:49                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-22 14:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-22 16:13                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24  0:12                         ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 13:28                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-24 14:57                             ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-24 15:23                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-24 15:36                                 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 15:01                           ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-24 16:35                             ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 16:42                               ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 17:28                               ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-24 22:23                                 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-24 22:44                                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-02-25  3:19                                     ` Gary Guo
2026-02-25 13:33                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-25 16:26                                     ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-25 21:15                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-26 12:28                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-27 15:09                                       ` Benno Lossin
2026-02-22 12:25                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-22 14:24                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-22 15:29                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-22 15:43                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-21 16:32             ` Alvin Sun
2026-02-21 17:53             ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] rust: add AMBA bus driver support Ke Sun
2026-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] rust: add device wakeup capability support Ke Sun
2026-01-17  0:44   ` Ke Sun
2026-01-16 16:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] rust: add RTC core abstractions and data structures Ke Sun
2026-01-16 16:34 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] rust: add PL031 RTC driver Ke Sun
2026-01-19  9:12   ` Ke Sun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DFSN0O9RRVD6.1LCI38JKGO1R0@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sk.alvin.x@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunke@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox