Re: [GIT PULL] RTC changes for 5.15

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>]

On 11/09/2021 10:05:02-0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > The broken down time conversion is similar to what is done
> > in the time subsystem since v5.14.
> 
> By "similar" you mean "identical", no?
> 
> Why is the rtc subsystem not just using the generic time64_to_tm()?
> 
> Yes, yes, I realize that due to historical mistakes, there's a
> duplicate 'struct rtc_time' struct, but it turns out that that is
> _identical_ to 'struct tm' except it also has a 'int tm_isdst' at the
> end.
> 
> So you could literally make a union of the two, pass the 'struct tm'
> part down to the generic code, and just do
> 
>      rtc_tm->tm_isdst = 0;
> 
> at the end.
> 
> Rather than have a duplicate copy of that admittedly clever Neri and
> Schneider algorithm.
> 
> Hmm?
> 

Yes, most of it is historical, I did have a look at removing the copy
but at the time, rtc_time64_to_tm was slightly more efficient because
it knew the time was positive.

The other issue is that struct rtc_time is exposed to userspace while
the kernel struct tm is not and this would tie both struct and if you
look close enough, struct tm has long tm_year and struct rtc_time has
int tm_year which on 32-bit ARM has a different size.

I've been reluctant to change struct tm because I didn't take the time
to check the impact on all the users (IIRC, mainly in filesystems).

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com