public inbox for linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtc: rzn1: support input frequencies other than 32768Hz
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 22:09:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_glj1NS6yRHHkyR@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXMPnJ9b_5gZ4SwCAeuHUTr3y92+d94X=os5HaYis1CTw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]


> > +               if (rate < 32000 || rate > BIT(22)) {
> 
> Perhaps
> 
>     #define RTCA0SCMP_MIN    32000
>     #define RTCA0SCMP_MASK    GEN_MASK(21. 0)
> 
> and
> 
>     if (rate < RTCA0SCMP_MIN || rate > FIELD_MAX(RTCA0SCMP_MASK) + 1)
> 
> ?

You really think this is more readable than the original code? I am
really tired of bike-shedding so I don't care much, but I do wonder...


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19 11:03 [PATCH 0/3] rtc: rzn1: support XTAL clk and SCMP method Wolfram Sang
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: rzn1: add optional second clock Wolfram Sang
2025-04-10 15:08   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-10 15:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-10 20:23       ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-11  6:20         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-11  6:38           ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: rzn1: Disable controller before initialization Wolfram Sang
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtc: rzn1: support input frequencies other than 32768Hz Wolfram Sang
2025-04-10 15:17   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-10 20:09     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-04-11  6:16       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-04-11  6:39         ` Wolfram Sang
2025-05-01 22:11           ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_glj1NS6yRHHkyR@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox