From: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, edliaw@google.com,
ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz,
tiwai@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, bongsu.jeon@samsung.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Add _GNU_SOURCE definition when including kselftest_harness.h
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 10:55:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjrpieLKXFhklVwR@linux.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507100651.8faca09c7af34de28f830f03@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:35:34 +0800 Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > asprintf() is declared in stdio.h when defining _GNU_SOURCE, but stdio.h
> > is so common that many files don’t define _GNU_SOURCE before including
> > stdio.h, and defining _GNU_SOURCE after including stdio.h will no longer
> > take effect.
> >
> > Since kselftest_harness.h introduces asprintf(), it is necessary to add
> > _GNU_SOURCE definition in all selftests including kselftest_harness.h,
> > otherwise, there will be warnings or even errors during compilation.
> > There are already many selftests that define _GNU_SOURCE or put the
> > include of kselftest_harness.h at the very beginning of the .c file, just
> > add the _GNU_SOURCE definition in the tests that have compilation warnings.
>
> That asprintf() continues to cause problems. How about we just remove
> it? Do the malloc(snprintf(str, 0, ...)) separately?
Removing asprintf() is indeed an good option, but using snprintf(str, 0, ...)
to get string size may go against the original intention of commit 38c957f07038.
Back to commit 38c957f07038, I don't see any advantage in using LINE_MAX.
Can we use a fixed value instead of LINE_MAX? E.g., 1024, 2048. Then we
just need to revert commit 809216233555.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-08 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 6:35 [PATCH] selftests: Add _GNU_SOURCE definition when including kselftest_harness.h Tao Su
2024-05-07 17:06 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-08 2:55 ` Tao Su [this message]
2024-05-08 14:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-08 17:57 ` Edward Liaw
2024-05-09 5:10 ` Tao Su
2024-05-09 5:08 ` Tao Su
2024-05-09 18:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjrpieLKXFhklVwR@linux.bj.intel.com \
--to=tao1.su@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edliaw@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).