From: CL Wang <cl634@andestech.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
<linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>, <cl634@andestech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] rtc: atcrtc100: Fix signedness bug in probe()
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:35:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR0s653C4g2auavf@swlinux02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRxPGBEX8hbY6sjV@stanley.mountain>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 01:48:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thank you for pointing out the issue and for providing the fix.
You're absolutely correct that using an unsigned type for alarm_irq
prevents proper error handling when platform_get_irq() returns a
negative value. I will apply your patch and also review other return
value checks to ensure there are no similar issues elsewhere.
Thank you again for your detailed review and suggestions.
Best regards,
CL
>
> The "atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq" variable is an unsigned int but it needs to
> be signed for the error handling to work. Use the "ret" variable
> instead.
>
> Fixes: 7adca706fe16 ("rtc: atcrtc100: Add ATCRTC100 RTC driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-atcrtc100.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-atcrtc100.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-atcrtc100.c
> index 51933ae1a2fa..9808fc2c5a49 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-atcrtc100.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-atcrtc100.c
> @@ -296,10 +296,12 @@ static int atcrtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "Failed to initialize RTC: unsupported hardware ID 0x%x\n",
> rtc_id);
>
> - atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> - if (atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq < 0)
> - return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq,
> + ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> "Failed to get IRQ for alarm\n");
> + atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq = ret;
> +
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> atcrtc_dev->alarm_irq,
> atcrtc_alarm_isr,
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 10:48 [PATCH next] rtc: atcrtc100: Fix signedness bug in probe() Dan Carpenter
2025-11-19 2:35 ` CL Wang [this message]
2025-11-19 7:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-12-08 22:08 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aR0s653C4g2auavf@swlinux02 \
--to=cl634@andestech.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox