From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
patrice.chotard@st.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:34:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cea926b2-5d84-18a9-9713-52d1495d550f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170623220907.kxhkwkl6gt7bho5r@piout.net>
Hi Alexandre,
On 06/23/2017 04:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 23/06/2017 at 13:40:41 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 06/19/2017 03:36 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>> On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the
>>> date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting
>>> the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106).
>>>
>>> To avoid this problem I add one RTC test file which directly use RTC ioctl
>>> to set and read RTC time and alarm values.
>>> rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line.
>>>
>>> On this version 2 I add check of problematics years in rtctest like suggest
>>> by Alexandre.
>>>
>>> Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver.
>>>
>>> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>>> tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate
>>> tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates
>>> rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug
>>>
>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c | 19 ++--
>>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c
>>>
>>
>> Hi Thomas/John,
>>
>> I can take the first two patches in this series through linux-kselftest
>> with your or John's Ack. Please review and let me know one way or the
>> other.
>>>
> Well, I'm the maintainer for rtctest.c and I'll make sure to also be the
> one for rtctest_setdate.c>
>> The third one is a rtc driver patch. Please let me know how do you want
>> to handle this series soon we can get this into 4.13-rc1.
>>
>
> I'll take the three patches but I still have comment I didn't have time
> to give yet.
>
>
Okay. I will drop this off my radar then :)
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-23 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-19 9:36 [rtc-linux] [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19 9:36 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19 9:36 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19 9:36 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tool: timer: rtctest add check for problematic dates Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-19 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug Benjamin Gaignard
2017-06-23 19:40 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc " Shuah Khan
2017-06-23 22:09 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-06-23 22:34 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2017-07-04 11:51 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2017-07-09 20:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cea926b2-5d84-18a9-9713-52d1495d550f@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox