From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Myeonghun Pak" <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: mt7622: allocate the RTC before requesting its IRQ
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 03:58:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175914@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179229507333.3965554.17726204422948048488.rtc-mt7622-irq-init-order@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] rtc: mt7622: clk disabled in mtk_rtc_remove() before devres teardown
--
commit aaf543ae0f6d2f3fb8f602ad5f4977facde6059e
Author: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
rtc: mt7622: allocate the RTC before requesting its IRQ
This patch reorders RTC allocation, hardware initialization, IRQ request,
and RTC registration in mtk_rtc_probe() so that devres unregisters the
RTC and frees its IRQ before dropping the final RTC device reference.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c
> index 9e17dd09d5673..c86c8cf3f2d77 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c
> @@ -324,12 +324,21 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + hw->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw->rtc)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(hw->rtc);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> hw->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (hw->irq < 0) {
> ret = hw->irq;
> goto err;
> }
>
> + mtk_rtc_hw_init(hw);
> + hw->rtc->ops = &mtk_rtc_ops;
> +
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, hw->irq, mtk_rtc_alarmirq,
> 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), hw);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -337,14 +346,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - mtk_rtc_hw_init(hw);
> -
> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
>
> - hw->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> - &mtk_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> - if (IS_ERR(hw->rtc)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(hw->rtc);
> + ret = devm_rtc_register_device(hw->rtc);
> + if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to register device\n");
> goto err;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
While this fixes the devres ordering between hw->rtc and hw->irq, what
about hw->clk during detach?
In mtk_rtc_probe(), hw->clk is enabled manually before the devm calls:
drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c:mtk_rtc_probe() {
...
ret = clk_prepare_enable(hw->clk);
if (ret)
return ret;
hw->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
...
}
And it is disabled in mtk_rtc_remove():
drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c:mtk_rtc_remove() {
struct mtk_rtc *hw = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
clk_disable_unprepare(hw->clk);
}
During driver unbind or module unload, __device_release_driver() calls
device_remove() -> mtk_rtc_remove() before device_unbind_cleanup() calls
devres_release_all().
Because hw->rtc and hw->irq are cleaned up by devres,
clk_disable_unprepare(hw->clk) runs while hw->rtc is still registered and
mtk_rtc_alarmirq() is still active. If an alarm interrupt fires or an
mtk_rtc_ops callback runs in that window, mtk_rtc_alarmirq() or the RTC
operations will access hw->base MMIO registers after hw->clk has already
been disabled:
drivers/rtc/rtc-mt7622.c:mtk_rtc_alarmirq() {
struct mtk_rtc *hw = (struct mtk_rtc *)id;
u32 irq_sta;
irq_sta = mtk_r32(hw, MTK_RTC_INT);
...
}
Should mtk_rtc_probe() use devm_clk_get_enabled() (and drop
mtk_rtc_remove()) so that hw->clk stays enabled until after devres
unregisters hw->rtc and frees hw->irq?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/179229507333.3965554.17726204422948048488.rtc-mt7622-irq-init-order@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-18 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-18 3:44 [PATCH] rtc: mt7622: allocate the RTC before requesting its IRQ Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-18 3:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175914@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox