From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Software evolution around scripts for the semantic patch langugae Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: <01282dbb-40c6-e039-fa7b-33c28eda2e8a@users.sourceforge.net> References: <82b84c9c-38a4-4d17-910f-312668dbae01@users.sourceforge.net> <20160825181009.381411d9.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20160825194039.218e795d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160825194039.218e795d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Cornelia Huck Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Walter Harms List-ID: > You obviously run some kind of semantic patching. Yes. - I developed some software for search patterns I became interested in. > It would really help ease review if you could publish the semantic patches > that generate your patches This is reasonable. > - that is probably more helpful in review than just posting the generated= patches. Which of the available scripts (or SmPL source files) would you like to dis= cuss further? > And it does not need to be "complete", I would feel more comfortable with publishing further scripts here when I c= an become more confident about relevant safety checks in this software area. > I'd think everyone on the cc: list here is able to handle a cocchinelle p= atch, > for example. Interesting view =85 I did not expect this kind of expertise by default. Regards, Markus