From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0020E8FDDC for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241758AbjJDImr (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 04:42:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241744AbjJDImq (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2023 04:42:46 -0400 Received: from out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-119.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.119]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0A1A7; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 01:42:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046059;MF=guwen@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=17;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VtMTZNd_1696408958; Received: from 30.13.48.40(mailfrom:guwen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VtMTZNd_1696408958) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:42:40 +0800 Message-ID: <0af36858-5141-4e7b-744d-ec446993010f@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:42:35 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism To: Alexandra Winter , kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: schnelle@linux.ibm.com, gbayer@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1695568613-125057-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> <2e4bb42a-1a6c-476e-c982-c4d6cfdac63b@linux.ibm.com> <1fc9a6aa-019d-f3f5-7cac-3b78388c2730@linux.ibm.com> <4bac8bcf-5507-0982-fed2-c507fc3264c2@linux.alibaba.com> From: Wen Gu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On 2023/9/29 21:31, Alexandra Winter wrote: > > > On 28.09.23 19:29, Wen Gu wrote: >> >> >> On 2023/9/28 16:56, Alexandra Winter wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 27.09.23 17:16, Alexandra Winter wrote: >>>> Hello Wen Gu, >>>> >>>> I applied and built your patches and noticed some things that you may want to consider in the next version: >>> >>> >>> FYI, patchwork basically complains about many the same issues: >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=787037&state=* >>> >>> In general you should run those check BEFORE you send the patches and not rely on patchwork. >> Thank you Sandy. I seem to have not seen the specific content of these checks. May I ask how to >> run those patchwork check locally? So that I can make sure everything is ok before send them. >> > > Citing from Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst : > > "patchwork checks > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel > scripts, the sources are available at: > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests > > **Do not** post your patches just to run them through the checks. > You must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally > before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance > gets overloaded very easily and netdev@vger really doesn't need more > traffic if we can help it." > > HTH Thank you! Sandy.